this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
77 points (96.4% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2434 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Australian government has raised the country’s terrorism threat level from “possible” to “probable”, reversing a change made nearly two years ago.

The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, made the announcement in Canberra on Monday.

Intelligence sources said the decision to raise the threat level was not triggered by any single issue or ideology, but noted an overall increase in polarisation in Australia and other western countries.

The sources said social cohesion was under strain and Covid-era grievances were being exacerbated by the Israel-Hamas conflict.

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Intelligence sources said the decision to raise the threat level was not triggered by any single issue or ideology, but noted an overall increase in polarisation in Australia and other western countries.

And who is responsible for this polarisation? Western media!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honestly? A handful of rich Americans are largely to blame.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A handful of rich Americans are largely to blame.

and Rupert Murdoch.

Where else do people in western countries get their information from?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

and Rupert Murdoch.

How is that any different to what they already said?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He's American, literally. Doesn't matter where he's from, old mates comment stands.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_Murdoch

In 1981, Murdoch bought The Times, his first British broadsheet, and, in 1985, became a naturalized US citizen, giving up his Australian citizenship, to satisfy the legal requirement for US television network ownership.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But he's also American isn't he?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Yes, he gave up official 'daily daft dingo' status in '85 so he could own american television networks

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I consider the colonial parts of AUS & NZ to be just as much “the West”. We’re all the same monoculture anglosphere besides minor surface differences.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“Minor” surface differences? Some of us call them parmas, and others parmis. That runs deep.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

May these two vastly different peoples leave peacefully among each other.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You know there are good public funded broadcasters in most of "western media" too, right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean...Rupert is an Aussie, so it's a...joint venture...🙄

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Takes me back to the Bush days of "threat level Orange." Hopefully this is as meaningless as that was.