Space

Newspapers used to employ teams of sub-editors to fix up the articles. I used to do that job for a major newspaper, and it was surprising to see how bad some of the stuff coming from journalists was. Sometimes you'd basically have to rewrite the whole article from scratch. With the decline in quality of what gets published, I can only assume that when paper sales collapsed and revenues dropped they all decided to cut costs by firing the sub-editors.

But this is just some website that probably never had any quality control to start with.

For posterity, here are the relevant sentences which were left incomplete in the article:

[City, State] – [Date] – The Northrop Grumman Cygnus spacecraft, carrying vital supplies and scientific experiments to the International Space Station (ISS), has encountered an issue during its journey to orbit.

According to NASA officials, the Cygnus spacecraft, named “S.S. Michael Freilich” in honor of the late NASA Earth Science Division director, launched successfully from Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia on [Date].

“We are currently assessing the situation and working to determine the best course of action,” said [Name], spokesperson for NASA.

The mission was scheduled to dock with the station on [Date], but this timeline is now uncertain.

The company has a long history of successful missions to the ISS, with this being its [Number] resupply mission.

While the exact nature of the issue has not been publicly disclosed, speculation within the space community suggests that it could involve [Possible issue speculation, e.g., a problem with the propulsion system or a communication failure].

Maybe they just wanted to leave it. You know, a sort of MadLibs make-your-own-article thing, for fun. Can't be any worse than existing internet misinformation sources.