this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
407 points (99.5% liked)

Science Memes

11068 readers
2785 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Experimentalists: understood, say no more.

Theorists: ok, show me the Hamiltonian...including the noise terms.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

Sources of error: psychosomatic popping noise interfered with measurements when viewing image

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

Nah... It's just that "usually calculations overestimate the experimental values".

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Where was the experiment run? On a battlefield?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

Setting up a bird listening device a few meters off an active runway and no filter for engine sounds.

Play back is of course volume tuned for the bird chirps when processing data

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago
  • Hey boss, we have sincere troubles, SNR is off by too much.
  • how much?
  • 20dB
  • ah, then we're good, that's so ridiculous it's def. a gain problem in your measurement setup
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

The funny thing about RF work is how casually a few orders of magnitudes gets thrown around. 10 dB fudge factors for assorted losses are quite common.