this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
8 points (90.0% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3406 readers
102 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's facinating to see, that only Lichtenstein seems to have to cross 2 countries to reach the ocean for trading.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Uzbekistan as well since the Caspian Sea is not an ocean.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Exclaves have been ignored :(

I was looking for the French-Brazilian border, or the Spain-UK one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Interesting that this map does have Palestine (presumably the West Bank and east Jerusalem) but doesn't consider Gaza part of Palestine.

That's quite a unique combination.

Edit: looking at Azerbaijan, I think they just focus on the biggest landmass and ignore exclaves.

Edit2: the fine print actually says that they ignore exclaves, except for Malaysia.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe it's just considering de facto control? Israel currently controls the whole Egypt-Palestine border, so there's no land controlled by any form of Palestinian government that has a border with Egypt

Edit: or it's an artifact of the "exclaves have otherwise been ignored" part, if the West Bank is considered the core and Gaza is an exclave of that

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Like all maps, this one needs a date. For example, Canada and Denmark now share a land border (Hans island)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Bolivia shares a border with Argentina. They got that wrong on this map.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

France has a land border with Brazil - in fact, it's its longest border with any country. But I realize that non-contiguous countries pose quite a challenge for this type of layout.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It made me think about that "maps only need 4 colors" (I don't remember the proper name, but it's an idea that maps with political borders can paint every state/country/whatever using 4 different colors and you'll never get the same color bordering another), seems like the perfect opportunity to see if it applies here

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

It's the Four Color Theorem.

And well, it's actually mathematically proven, but not for maps with disjointed regions that need to be colored the same, such as Alaska + mainland USA.
(In that particular case, it's not too difficult to resolve, but you don't get a guarantee for it.)

The map in the post actually merges such disjointed regions, though, so it absolutely should work there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Here's a way to do it https://i.imgur.com/YULx0sg.jpeg

East Africa and the Balkans took a little bit of figuring out

Edit: and sure enough, there's actually a mistake in East Africa. DR Congo and Tanzania shouldn't be the same colour. I think it can be fixed with the following changes:

  • Eritrea, Somaliland, and Kenya > green
  • Djibouti and Somalia > blue
  • Ethiopia > red
  • Tanzania > cyan
  • Zambia > blue
  • Mozambique > red
  • Malawi and Eswatini > green
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is this only land borders? The US and Russia share a maritime border

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Not even land borders. It's missing France-Brazil, UK-Spain, and France-Netherlands at the very least.