I did not see in the article any arguments, except the fact that Chinese researchers are in some US blacklists. Only proclamations about EU should restrict, EU should prevent, etc. But without any arguments why. Maybe lack of actual arguments is the reason why the article is so short?
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
[...] called quantum technologies “potentially revolutionary and disruptive” and classed them as “an element of strategic competition” with rival states [...] for components that can have military as well as civilian uses [and potentially] give China a scientific and military edge.
So the article is quite clear, just read it.
Basically, it is what China has always been doing, too. Many argue that China has even harsher rules regarding international collaboration -in both science and economy- and does not show any willingness for reciprocity.
Every tie and dependancy on China must be severed until they demonstrate and prove they are not EmperorShit that controls fuck-all and that they will bend the knee to the West's demands if they want shit from us
They need to confess they need Daddy West and come hat-in-hand with tears in their eyes and redeem themselves and start acting like a citizen of a united world, tired of their paper-tiger horseshit