this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
96 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2846 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

But what if it had been Trump himself who had been shot away, and only Trump’s ear fragment had been saved by security? Could Trump’s meat ear rim itself have been persuaded to run for the presidency? Could Trump’s ear flesh fragment have beaten Biden in a democratic election? Almost certainly. And would an America governed by a small severed slice of Trump’s ear have offered the world a more secure future than an America governed by Trump, or an America governed by Biden? Again, the answer, sadly, is a resounding yes.

The American Christian right believes that Trump, despite his obvious moral corruption, is a massive tool of a God bent on shaping America into their own twisted theocracy. Evangelical Christian America believes their selectively myopic deity actually intervened to save Trump from the gunman, while leaving a heroic volunteer firefighter to take the bullet. Blessed are the firefighters. But how much more useful to this morally equivocating God is a simple severed ear, unencumbered by accusations that it tried to overturn an election, or paid an adult film star hush money, or stole classified documents, or sexually assaulted a woman in a department store. The ear would be innocent and pure and good, like Jesus, or the unborn child.

And if an ear had, as Trump did, repeatedly socialised with the unsavoury sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and his young friends, it is unlikely it would have been able to do anything inappropriate, due to its being an ear. And should the ear be found to have lost the public trust, it could, due to its inability to defend itself or argue its case, be easily dispensed with by the Republicans without too much fuss. Ear today, gone tomorrow.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago (2 children)

heroic

My dude, he was at a Trump rally. Wanting to take away women's rights, demonizing immigrants, disenfranchising non-white voters, pushing for a white Christofascist ethnostate, increasing taxes on the poor while removing them for the rich, and supporting a criminal who wants to be a dictator (among other evils) more than offsets anything he might have done as a firefighter.

I am not saying he deserved to be shot (because no American does) but he also doesn't deserve any amount of worship either.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

Saw a FB post from him with the "Killdozer" drawing, and the text of 'Tread on them'. He may have done good work, but that does not make him heroic.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Christians always do this shit. "There was a 20 car pile up on the highway today. 8 died, 4 are in intensive care and might not make it. If I hadn't spilled coffee on my pants this morning and had to change before leaving for work, I probably would have been car 21." "Wow, God was looking out for you." And God what... decided to smite the other people? The suggestion that God intentionally saved/spared someone from a tragedy means that God also intentionally didn't spare those who were in the tragedy. You are implicitly judging those people to have deserved it. To have faced divine justice. I feel like they never think about that very obvious conclusion. Nevermind that it also undermines their belief that humans have free will if God is just tipping over coffee cups and deflecting bullets to manipulate outcomes of life and death.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

You are implicitly judging those people to have deserved it.

It's not a bug, it's a feature. You don't have to feel bad about not helping the poor and needy if God made them that way intentionally

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

They're not giving their personal guardian angels enough credit also

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

well duh. prosperity doctorine. for jesus said unto them it is easier for a poor man to walk through the eye of the needle than to get to heaven and blessed are those who are rich in coin for they will inherit the kingdom of heaven as he jumped down from the cross and pulled out a roman guards head and spine before he jumped on his winged unicorn to ascend to heaven.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Oh yeah I saw that episode.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Don't some also think it's proof he is the Antichrist?

Something about the beasts head being mortally wounded but then being completely healed - and the world followed him

It's maybe not all Christians but there are certainly many evangelicals who will believe literally anything if they feel it advances their goal of bringing about the biblical end of days.

I don't think they really care if they actually are on the Jesus side of the whole apocalypse. They are happy enough to believe they are, despite categorically rejecting everything about Jesus.

Their thoughts and opinions are literally worthless aside from being dangerous. They don't believe them outside of a means to advance their goals - but will react with extreme prejudice and hostility if they don't get their way.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I guess that's to be expected from the same deity that allows gunmen to shoot up whole schoolrooms full of children.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

GoDs PlAn!!! 🤡

Just like giving kids bone cancer is part of the plan. It's all about horrible things being somehow an amazing plan.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Most religion is a mental disorder. Medical professionals have done the world a great disservice by trying to pretend otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

To be fair, Christians are supposed to believe that all children who die go to heaven unless they weren't baptized in which case they go to Limbo or Hell (because of Original Sin), depending on whether or not you believe Saint Augustine's statements on the matter (he's the one that said they go to Limbo but there's actually no official stance on it).

The Catholic belief is that a school shooter could kill an entire school full of baptized children then ask for forgiveness right before his death by any cause other than suicide, and everyone goes to heaven. Yay! Super quick shortcut, right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

I bet that the reason why we haven't heard anything about Trump's medical treatment is because he was actually hit by broken glass from a teleprompter. Being grazed by a bullet is more dramatic and makes it easier to dupe his followers with "divine intervention".