this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
961 points (97.4% liked)

People Twitter

5151 readers
1681 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 125 points 3 months ago (8 children)

This is why we dont have cool things any more... we make up our own knowledge just because it seems to fit

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago

That's what I thought when I was a kid but I was told I was wrong!

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago

Acronyms didn't become popular until fairly recently, so if the word is at least a century old, odds are that it isn't an acronym.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

But when I take a brake, doesn’t that mean I’m stopping work, hitting the brakes?

When I diffuse a situation, doesn’t that mean I’m thinning out the tension or whatever?

People make up whatever reason they need to avoid going to a dictionary to understand what they’re writing.

(It’s break and defuse, in case anyone was wondering. The first doesn’t need explanation, but defuse is because you want to cut the fuse off from the thing that’s going to blow up, the thing being the situation)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 80 points 3 months ago (5 children)

NORTH EAST WEST SOUTH

At least that's what they taught us in journalism school

[–] [email protected] 72 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Actually it's Never Eat While Shitting

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oops. Should I not have done that? I mean if anyone had told me that sort of thing is frowned upon I never would've...

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They're joking. You should actually always eat while shitting and shit while eating. No exceptions.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

That's what the nice shelf is for on the toilet

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That doesn’t even make sense, who would refer to cardinal directions in that order?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (4 children)

The Catholic Church says hi.:-P

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Isn’t it forehead chest, shoulder shoulder? So NSEW?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Lol, imagine if "sports" was part of the origin story of news as a concept.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 months ago (5 children)

I take issue with sports being in headline news practically every day, or multiple days per week at least.

I have nothing against people enjoying sports, but it's a hobby like any other, which I think is unreasonably thrust upon everyone else.

Where is the eSports news, or competitive dancing, woodworking news, or as I'm sure we can all agree on Lemmy, what about my old electronic gadget of the week news?

When I had The Guardian app, it was quite annoying that sports was lumped in with the push notifications for actual news.

I'm just saying sports news ought to be opt-in like any other hobby.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I agree. I can't stand that every restaurant or bar has to have a TV or 20 that are all tuned to talking heads blowing hot air over what sports guy #876,914 did last night, or what sports guy #1,456,888 will do tomorrow night.

Even when it's live sports, the broadcast is still more commercials than game, every square inch of the playing area is plastered with ads, plus the ads that are on the overlay, plus this instant replay is brought to you by A1 Hemorrhoid cream, from the Mega-Car Savings Plus Center, at beautiful Jack the Ambulance Chaser Stadium: "When you drive drunk, call Jack to blame on the innocent™!"

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Byzantine politics did have political parties and professional sports teams as literally the same thing, so it's not completely insane as a concept.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 months ago (1 children)

From the Etymonline website:

news (n.) late 14c., "new things," plural of new (n.) "new thing" (see new (adj.)); after French nouvelles, which was used in Bible translations to render Medieval Latin nova (neuter plural) "news," literally "new things."

The English word was construed as singular at least from the 1560s, but it sometimes still was regarded as plural 17c.-19c. The odd and doubtful construction probably accounts for the absurd folk-etymology (attested by 1640 but originally, and in 18c. usually, in jest-books) that claims it to be an abbreviation of north east south west, as though "information from all quarters of the compass."

The meaning "tidings, intelligence of something that has lately taken place" is from early 15c. The meaning "radio or television program presenting current events" is from 1923. Bad news in the extended sense of "unpleasant person or situation" is from 1926. Expression no news, good news can be traced to 1640s. Expression news to me "something I did not know" is from 1889.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I always assumed it was news as plural. Here's a list of new's. This is new, that is new.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

I'm pretty sure this is the actual etymology of news.

People asking each other "what new things?" becomes "what news", as well as usage like "that information is new to me" becoming "that is news to me"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

It's not only okay not to pluralize with an apostrophe, ever, but as a bonus it makes what you wrote into English.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Might as well call it Olds then, these days, considering how repetitious it all is.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It takes less time to Google that or ask a device, than to post that disinfo

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago

Disinfo gets engagement though.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm surprised. Merriam-Webster is usually the Urban Dictionary of print dictionaries. I'd have more expected them to change their definition because "muh common usage."

Hacks. OED or death.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 months ago (9 children)

I love that there are strong opinions like this out there for dictionaries.

You've convinced me. I'm ride or die for OED now too.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I never really thought about choosing a side, but I am a staunch supporter of the Oxford comma. I guess now I know which side I’m on. Let’s fucking go

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Oh, extra points for the Oxford comma, too. That automatically grants you Pope status.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

the gold standard lexicon

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Hopefully you're an "Oxford comma, ride or die", too.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Of course! I'd have thought that went without saying. I'm not a barbarian.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I once read an article praising the 1913 edition of the Webster's dictionary and I have been using it ever since (in the form of GNU Collaborative International Dictionary of English). That with etymonline makes the reading experience quite pleasant.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

etymology has nothing to do with common usage.

also common usage is what defines words; that has nothing to do with MW. that's how language works. i can't believe there are still prescriptionists in this century.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Never Eat Wheat Shredders.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Damn right. Wheat shredders are important to the economy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Not Everyone Wants Sausage

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

No actually means "noteworthy observation" so it's nice to get that validation.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

As I remember olds is short for: Offhand Lewd Developments and Summaries

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Of course we all know that "news" stands for Never EVER Work Safe.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Isnt that Amazon warehouse motto?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›