Aren't there a shit ton of people that search for them? They're in the news constantly and if you're still (somehow) undecided what better way to keep up with them than by searching. Not to mention anyone that wants to make a meme about them.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Sounds like someone has been searching for Trump and Biden. 👀
When's the last time you searched for Garland or Wray
Which of them is up for election?
Neither. Does that change whether you searched for them?
Absolutely. When talking search results, the vast majority of searches will be for the top two candidates for POTUS in a few months.
I would bet the majority of Americans don't know Wray or Garland, but damn near everyone has heard of Trump and Biden. I don't even know who Wray is, so I'm certainly not going to search for him.
The post I replied to was basically saying it's likely that a large swath of the public would search for all these people. My comment was that most don't know who Wray and Garland are. You are arguing my point.
F.B.I. officials told members of Congress on Wednesday that the gunman who tried to kill former President Donald J. Trump used his cellphone to search for images of Mr. Trump and President Biden, along with a wide array of public figures.
According to a person on conference calls with lawmakers, the gunman, Matthew Crooks, also searched for dates of Mr. Trump’s appearances and the Democratic National Convention.
Seems like he was looking to take out both Trump and Biden.
Or just anyone of notoriety who was nearby
Yeah more likely an opportunist
Obviously that never would've happened, but holy shit that would've made for a unique election cycle.
It's like the dude saw the meme after the debate that said:
Live Biden > Biden corpse > Trump corpse > live Trump
and thought "yeah, I should make that happen."
More pertinent information released from FBI and reported from major news organizations:
"Groceries found in suspects home"
"Suspect wore underwear"
"Suspect may have woken up the morning of the attack"
Exactly, it's part of everyone's routine to Google the dates of Trump's appearances and the DNC before heading off to an assassination attempt. Totally normal stuff.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
According to a person on conference calls with lawmakers, the gunman, Thomas Matthew Crooks, also searched for dates of Mr. Trump’s appearances and the Democratic National Convention.
The disclosures, during private briefings to lawmakers in the House and Senate, offered more detail about a gunman with no criminal history.
Among the other famous figures the gunman searched for: Mr. Wray himself, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland and a member of the British royal family, according to two officials with knowledge of the situation, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss the matter publicly.
Officials singled out some of the searches on one of his cellphones — the device he left in his residence — saying that he had looked up “major depressive disorder,” according to the person on the calls.
Some senators left their call angry with the Secret Service after learning that the gunman was identified as suspicious more than an hour before the shooting.
No one has taken responsibility,” Senator John Barrasso, Republican of Wyoming, said in a statement, adding, “The head of the Secret Service needs to go.”
The original article contains 362 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 50%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!