this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
59 points (94.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4533 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Aren't there a shit ton of people that search for them? They're in the news constantly and if you're still (somehow) undecided what better way to keep up with them than by searching. Not to mention anyone that wants to make a meme about them.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

Sounds like someone has been searching for Trump and Biden. 👀

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When's the last time you searched for Garland or Wray

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Which of them is up for election?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Neither. Does that change whether you searched for them?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely. When talking search results, the vast majority of searches will be for the top two candidates for POTUS in a few months.

I would bet the majority of Americans don't know Wray or Garland, but damn near everyone has heard of Trump and Biden. I don't even know who Wray is, so I'm certainly not going to search for him.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

The post I replied to was basically saying it's likely that a large swath of the public would search for all these people. My comment was that most don't know who Wray and Garland are. You are arguing my point.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

F.B.I. officials told members of Congress on Wednesday that the gunman who tried to kill former President Donald J. Trump used his cellphone to search for images of Mr. Trump and President Biden, along with a wide array of public figures.

According to a person on conference calls with lawmakers, the gunman, Matthew Crooks, also searched for dates of Mr. Trump’s appearances and the Democratic National Convention.

Seems like he was looking to take out both Trump and Biden.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Or just anyone of notoriety who was nearby

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

Yeah more likely an opportunist

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Obviously that never would've happened, but holy shit that would've made for a unique election cycle.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

It's like the dude saw the meme after the debate that said:

Live Biden > Biden corpse > Trump corpse > live Trump

and thought "yeah, I should make that happen."

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

More pertinent information released from FBI and reported from major news organizations:

"Groceries found in suspects home"

"Suspect wore underwear"

"Suspect may have woken up the morning of the attack"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Exactly, it's part of everyone's routine to Google the dates of Trump's appearances and the DNC before heading off to an assassination attempt. Totally normal stuff.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


According to a person on conference calls with lawmakers, the gunman, Thomas Matthew Crooks, also searched for dates of Mr. Trump’s appearances and the Democratic National Convention.

The disclosures, during private briefings to lawmakers in the House and Senate, offered more detail about a gunman with no criminal history.

Among the other famous figures the gunman searched for: Mr. Wray himself, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland and a member of the British royal family, according to two officials with knowledge of the situation, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss the matter publicly.

Officials singled out some of the searches on one of his cellphones — the device he left in his residence — saying that he had looked up “major depressive disorder,” according to the person on the calls.

Some senators left their call angry with the Secret Service after learning that the gunman was identified as suspicious more than an hour before the shooting.

No one has taken responsibility,” Senator John Barrasso, Republican of Wyoming, said in a statement, adding, “The head of the Secret Service needs to go.”


The original article contains 362 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 50%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!