this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
269 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

59292 readers
3982 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

World’s first crewed liquid hydrogen plane takes off::undefined

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While technically zero emission, 95% of hydrogen is created using natural gas reformation. It's really really disingenuous to say zero emission when it uses a huge amount of fossil fuels in the creation of the fuel

https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-fuel-basics#:~:text=Today%2C%20hydrogen%20fuel%20can%20be,solar%2Ddriven%20and%20biological%20processes.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The point is that, unlike kerosene, hydrogen can be made using clean energy

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The point is that, until electrolysis is cheaper than using natural gas, it will continue to be made with natural gas.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, but now the onus is moved away from finding a non polluting engine, which needs to be on the moving vehicle, to a non polluting fuel, which can be produced anywhere. And can technically and with proper regulation be produced with no pollution. Which is a lot more than the current state of affairs.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's really lucky for fossil fuel companies who will be making bank on hydrogen, and stalling any research or innovation in green hydrogen. You act like there are no major players making tons of money from hydrogen already, who don't want electrolysis to gain any ground against the status quo which is making them filthy rich

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Again, this can be achieved through regulation. Regulating the source of hydrogen manufacturing process, for once. If a government wants, it can do it and enforce it.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So what, we keep burning coal because it is cheaper ?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

nice false equivalency. And I'm not prescribing anything, I'm describing what is currently happening, and that it will continue to happen until electrolysis is more profitable than natural gas.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It can be, but it takes a huge amount of power to do it, and the biggest hydrogen production method (reforming) produces GHGs itself

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

So what? Build solar plants in Africa, pump out hydrogen, keep flying as often as you want emissions free. It is a solution and as such a hydrogen plane is a massive advancement towards a sustainable future for the aviation. Whether it will turn oit this way is a different question.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Was this one though? It says they’re using Air Liquide, and here’s a quote FTA:

Something else a future of clean-burning, hydrogen-powered aviation requires is — other than the actual fuel — is refuelling infrastructure. For Project HEAVEN, H2FLY has been working with Air Liquide.

For the French industrial gas supplier, which is betting heavily on green hydrogen as part of the future energy mix, it is also about demonstrating viability and shoring up industry demand. “This is the very first time we have brought liquid hydrogen to be refuelled at a commercial airport,” said Pierre Crespi, Innovation Director at Air Liquide Advanced Technologies.

(Emphasis mine) if it’s green hydrogen, doesn’t that mean it was made using clean energy (as opposed to gray hydrogen)?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Air Liquide is the supplyer of the hydrogen. You have green and blue hydrogen. One is produced with reformation and carbon capture while the other one is produced with electrolysis. So, if the electricity is from renewable then it's technically zero emission.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yes I understand that. OP said it wasn’t, and the article didn’t say specifically what was used for this flight, only that Air Liquide wants to use green H2 for this project.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wouldn't bet on a company telling you that they're using "green hydrogen" to be doing anything other than pulling the wool over your eyes. There's a reason the fossil fuel industry is heavily invested in hydrogen and pro hydrogen propaganda. Once you start noticing it becomes really obvious

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

In this very specific area, though, it’s like a badge of honor. If it was Shell or Exxon, lol no. And you’re right to be skeptical. But for the Fuel Cell airplane company, they specifically sought out a company who could provide green hydrogen because that is their goal and motivation. There are some companies who do provide this service for the same reasons - they genuinely care about the climate crisis and want to change things. They “nerd out” about being able to do this, for lack of a better expression. If you’re ever in a room with a lot of them, it’s very obvious.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's not a new plane, that's the double fuselage version of Pipistrel Taurus: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pipistrel_Taurus

Pipistrel Taurus is a glider, first flown in 2004. There is an added benefit of using a glider for testing a new engine: gliders have a much better L/D ratio, so less power needed for longer flights, and if there is a malfunction they can land safely while gliding.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Should have used helium. Works for balloons!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

LEL for Hydrogen: 4.0 (% in air)
UEL is 75 %
This is the most severe (wide range) for any fuel.
LEL and UEL Explained (Explosive Gas) - Projectmaterials

This is on top to hydrogen enbrittlement and low temperature enbrittlement of metals.

Good luck with the insurance fees for commercial flights.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Aviation is the one field, where burning some form of carbohydrate is actually the only viable option. Batteries may be an option for short flights, but I don't see any solution for long haul flights.

Whether the fuel ends up being (synthetic) kerosene or some plant oil stuff doesn't really matter, the turbine isn't going anywhere.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah getting aircraft onto renewable energy is probably the lowest priority, if everything else was renewable it wouldn't even matter if they were never renewable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree...
( except for a small typo : it's carbohydride or hydrocarbon )

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no no, the planes need a big plate of spaghetti before long haul journeys

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Lol, nice 😋,
Also it's amazing how birds can effectively do that !