this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
32 points (97.1% liked)

Open Source

31218 readers
313 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'd like to compress my videos without using the terminal, what is the best GUI today that can do this?

Is this kind of program popular on linux? I know that ffmpeg is very popular on the terminal

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 41 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Handbrake was my goto, unsure if its still recommended

https://handbrake.fr/

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Still is and still gets actively developed. The best free video transcoding software, if not the best in general.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Second this, handbrake is the defacto tool for this area.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Only downside is that they do not want to add features, simple stuff like replacing the audio. But otherwise yes, go to solution

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They have their scope. It's a video transcoder. Programs are better suited to doing their job well rather than stretching themselves thin with loads of features.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Then why can we apply video filters etc. if it is only for transcoding? That is a really basic thing. Like no audio or pass through. You can also add subtitles. Why not audio?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm not a developer. Just explaining why projects keep within their scope and don't bloat their software with features, which in turn take more effort to maintain.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

I know, all good, that is just such an odd choice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

There are muxing apps that can do that.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Handbrake is great. But I would also recommend using Kdenlive. It is a video editor but if you just open your video in it and just export the project, you will get some good output format options.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

When I realized I could just make high quality GIFs with KDEnlive it was a game changer.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

How is your experience with exporting GIFs in terms of file size? They tend to run larger than, say, mp4 files, right?

I use Shotcut btw.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

GIFs exported in the original file resolution are usually pretty damn big, but I don't like giant GIFs myself, so I've found the 480x270 to be a good size to keep most of them below 25 megabytes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I recommend using WebM container with VP9 codec instead of GIF if you are exporting it for web. It even supports alpha.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Handbrake is good for a few files, but I still prefer ffmpeg when doing a large batch.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

You can batch processes in handbrake.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why? I have done ~100 files in one batch with no issue?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's easier to type a command than it is to add files to Handbrake one at a time. I can also run multiple encodes simultaneously. It takes 2-4 to max out my CPU depending on the codec and resolution.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why one at a time? Just load a folder and apply the same settings to all of them. If the settings are different per file.. not sure which method would be less annoying.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't let me select more than 1 file to add.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I think the option was single file or whole folder.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Shutter Encoder

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

I use Shotcut for more or less any video operations that require re-encoding. It's great for basic editing but also simple transcoding jobs too