this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
225 points (96.3% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4302 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 62 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The Republicans are creating a whole group of voters who are the opposite of WOKE: Deliberately Uninformed with Misguided Beliefs (DUMB). And it’s contagious, as being DUMB spreads like wildfire under right wing voters.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Using this.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 4 months ago

This is a surprisingly good article. It would be nice to see more of the mainstream media reporting on how insidious his disinformation campaign(/lies) is.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago

They are just breaking down all the systems and consolidating power while they are doing it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

Nah, it's from the mid-90s when Rush and Newt killed policy based politics in favor of an eternity of reality-challenged polemics.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

This isn’t new, it’s just out of the closet now. If it weren’t for weaponized ignorance, conservatism would have died out long, long ago.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

That's like saying "baseball players pitching balls at the batter is a dangerous game."

Like, that's the game. The whole game. It always has been. Why are you using the verbs in the present tense to imply that it's something new, something they haven't been doing from the beginning?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I don't think it's as much ignorance as it is tribalism. Humans are highly tribal, by our nature. People believe what they are told by trusted authorities, by the trusted leaders of their "tribe." People will be skeptical of anything that doesn't come from a member of their own tribe, even if what they're being told is based in facts and evidence. Politicians have known this for a very long time, and they use it to their advantage. They just have to convince a group of people (usually one that feels alienated or disenfranchised) that they are "one of them," and then you can steer them in the direction you want them to go, usually by pinning them against some other, opposing tribe.

Conservatives and liberals are opposing tribes. They don't like each other and they don't trust each other. All Donald Trump and other conservative politicians have to do is present positions that are in opposition to liberalism, the ideology of their hated enemy tribe, and members of the conservative tribe will quickly adopt them, not out of ignorance but out of tribalism.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Really disgusting, particularly coming from "law and order" leaders who are turning the U.S. into a police state. I hope we see more articles about this leading up into the election.

I'd also like to see more discussion about striking a number of non-violent crimes. If a criminal and felonious ex-president will have special exemptions to laws that others are expected to follow, doesn't the guideline of equality demand similar treatment for the poor and politically disenfranchised?