this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
381 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19136 readers
3510 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 61 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I wonder what piece of shit group will be the first to sue to block this.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Angry students? Lol.

Really though, odds are high the suit will come from some group that got PPP loans forgiven.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

As I tell my kids: if you want to make things fair by making something better for someone else, that’s great. If you want to make things fair by making something worse for someone else, you’re doing it wrong.

I would hope that angry students would not sue to prevent something that would help so many people in the name of “fairness”.

Besides, if anything, actions like this just establish more precedent that encourages further action against unfair debt.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Literally my first thought. What about students? We are saddled with debt at the start of our adult lives after being told by our parents and grandparents and teacher and school counselors that we HAVE to go to college or we end up broke and on the street or 'flipping burgers'. This toxic push has ironically made people broke and end up on the street, and flipping burgers is actually something people can do to get by due to minimum wage increases.

Colleges and private lending firms can get fucked on this in my opinion. My college experience was basically feeling like a money piñata. Figuratively every step in any direction was designed to bleed the student dry, ON TOP OF their tuition. I mean books, parking which is not even guaranteed, fancy gyms and rec centers (you all must pay, even if not using) to draw in or attract new ~~suckers~~ students for the same shill.

I'm not saying students don't benefit or learn anything. However the cost and the massive debt students take on when not even fully aware of what consequences this will have on their future is staggering. If life lessons have a number, a good kick in the cojones would be the cost of going to college because literally everyone around you including family peer pressured you into it, and then later struggling to find work in normal jobs.

Trickle that down to being unable to then afford a home or barely housing, food, energy. But you know, avocado fucking toast and everything is our fault amiright?

But hey, back to not being able to call bankruptcy on student debt or have that affecting adults and their credit scores.

This is not a new problem and Biden is the first to actually do something tangible about the debt problem there, but it's still a start in my opinion. Real change needs to happen or the debt reservoir fills back up and colleges squeeze rocks ever harder.

P.S.: And no, we're not enrolling in underwater basket weaving degrees you right-wing parrot twats.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

To be fair, a lot of student debt has also been forgiven over the last year. Not saying there isn’t more to do.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 months ago

Woah, that’s actually kind of a big deal. There’s still a shitload more progress to be had, but this is incredibly good news.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago (5 children)

I'm all for this but... Why would anyone pay a medical debt anymore? Wouldn't you just sit on it forever? What's the incentive to ever pay?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago

That’s the point. Fuck the predatory healthcare industry

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago

National healthcare with one weird trick

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A big chunk of the population doesn't pay anyways. Those who do are the ones with assets which might be seized

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

In other words, those who can afford it pay. Now those who can't afford it don't get punished.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Socialized healthcare with extra steps, but about time the US got there

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Socialized healthcare seems like a stretch, but definitely a step in the right direction.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

This doesn't stop collection activities. It only stops that from showing up on credit reports.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Medical debt lawsuits?

That happens now but is generally poor PR, so most hospitals don’t do it. I can see some gross future wherein they point to this and say “without credit extortion, we have no choice but to sue,” and the American populace just accepts this. Hopefully not though. That could well lead to increased scrutiny on the shit ass healthcare system (I nonetheless have low hopes).

Hospitals are already losing a ton of money by having to refer cases to collection agencies, which already have a relatively low success rate. Perhaps they should see this and push for single payer where they would not need to have entire business departments and collection agency partners creating massive overhead. The system as-is doesn’t work for them either.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Gotta give credit where it’s due - this is a great move by the Biden administration. More like this please!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Only if he wins in November, and follows through..

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Yeah, wouldn’t be nearly as much medical debt if Biden hadn’t preemptively given away the public option. But the Dems seem to only be interested in tiny little baby steps, so if that’s all that’s on offer this is technically a win.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

sometime next year

The ol classic voting year spin on the bait n switch eh?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

That is literally all of my debt left, so yay!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

God I bet my Republican coworker is pissed

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What effect does it have on debts already reported?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

My guess — and I'm not 100% sure — is that it requires them to no longer count towards the credit score once the new rule goes into effect. Which it may not if Trump takes power.