this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
394 points (99.2% liked)

Work Reform

10137 readers
42 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 44 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Can we tax them now please?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago

I think that’s being too kind.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You misspelled tar and feathers.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 months ago

✔️ Spaceships

❌ Sharing

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Ask AI for the recipe.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago (4 children)

The scary thing is that I'm sure they're proud of this fact.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

Nah, those 8 are probably more like "how do those 3.8 billion poor people have anything?"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

"It's not enough!" 🤑🤑🤑🤑

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Yeah, but I think the admiration they get from countless others is an even bigger problem. It’s as if they are the pinnacle of what a human can be. Because… money?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

This is called narcissism

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Guillotines, bruh. Probably available on Amazon!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Only need 1 and a sponge. And we don't really need the sponge.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

I like the fact we're warming up to the guillotine but we should probably have a plan for when and how to use it otherwise we might end up with another Robespierre on our hands which can be quite problematic.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

Such a lazy bunch, they could've worked 500 million times as hard.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I wonder whether I'm in the bottom or top 50%

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If you live in a "developed" country, and you are not homeless, you are probably not in that 50%. That 50% largely lives on ~3 dollars a day on average.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Not necessarily. Folks in developed countries have much greater opportunities to rack up debt and large negative equity. I would not be surprised if the bottom % are made up of students and gamblers that in practice have a far higher standard of living due to their access to money, relative to the developing world where people with a "net 0" balance are starving to death.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

But I might join their ranks one day, so this is an aspirational post, right? /s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm reading this as "8 people have half of all the money in the world" is that correct?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It is not. Because of wealth disparity, that half of the population has less than half the money.

It's still disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

This makes sense. Yes. And yes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

that is a cage match that I would like to see

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

State is the mechanism that allows them to exist, it is it's purpose.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand this statement. What is meant by "state"?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

The word "state" when used this way refers to a group of people that feel entitled to use violence to formally dominate a given region. Unlike a simple gang, they create strict formal hierarchy and have rules that apply to those they dominate but not them. They are allowed to use violence and this is acceptable, me and you are not allowed to defend ourselves, we are to give up virtually all our "rights" to self-defense to the state. A state gaslights it's victims into believing that it is necessary to protect them from themselves and other states, and the only way civilization can exist.

This is not to be confused with "government", which is a management function most states perform to some degree and which does not require a state.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago

I never like this particular comparison because there are so many people in the world who have nothing, or nothing but debt. Is hard to tell from it how much is the wealth of the top or the poverty of the bottom. It would almost be better to compare to the next group down, or to an average or something.

Maybe a graph with one block being the richest person, and then groups of the next n richest people, however many it takes to equal the richest. And then keep doing that, so there's more and more blocks to equal the richest. I bet it ramps up really fast.