this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3429 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

A couple figures to aid the discussion. Hot off the presses from todays polling:

Biden versus Trump (up to date as of today):

Biden versus Trump and Clinton versus Trump (X axis is days out from the election):

For edification, Clinton versus Trump 2016 (keep in mind that Trump and Clintons polling numbers in the early parts of this figure represent being in contested primaries):

Another version comparing 2016 to 2024 (but more focused on the period of time before the election):

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't find these kinds of comparisons and "latest data points" to be particularly helpful in these kinds of discussions. Voter sentiment is fickle, and how you quantify the "Uncommitted" movement will affect how the data is presented.

We don't know how the Uncommitted will actually vote in November, though we can be certain at least some will not vote for Biden if nothing changes. It's a political game of chicken, and it's Biden's move.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We don’t know how the Uncommitted will actually vote in November, though we can be certain at least some will not vote for Biden if nothing changes. It’s a political game of chicken, and it’s Biden’s move.

Clinton lost Michigan by 0.2% and it cost her the election. Her campaign opted to not focus on the rust belt and delivered us Trump in the first place.

Biden is losing this election, and I think if a Trump presidency concerns you, its especially worth considering.

Biden can't afford to lose any voters in Michigan. His policies are working against his ability to gather support in the 2024 election. We can't wait until after November to have this conversation. It needs to happen now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Again, if Trump can’t win more than 65% of his own base as a former president, I’m not that worried. The dude has never won the popular it’s and sure as hell won’t this time. He’s definitely lost support. I will place money that Biden will win an even larger popular and electoral vote victory this time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I would love to have your confidence bro. I really would. I just look at the polling, I look at the messaging, I look at the fervency of the bases, and I don't have it.

Trumps voters are excited as all hell to vote for him. He's got evangelicals perhaps literally worshiping him.

I just dont see what you are seeing..

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’ll bet you here and now Biden wins. Save this post.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Saved. Love to gamble.

I'll give you 1:1 on Biden winning. $20 enough to make it fun?

Also, I'd like to ask for 20:1 on Biden not being the candidate. If you want those odds, I'd also like to bet $20. (you'd be the house, so if I win, thats a $400 payout on you).

We can save this post and then venmo or paypal, whatever is preferred.

Also good with just the first bets or will hear counter odds on Biden not being the candidate.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

100% Biden is the candidate. 100% Biden beats Trump.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

SO bet than? We good with this and you good to keep to terms? 20$ on 1:1, and 20$ on 20:1?

Cus I would LOVE for you to take that $40 from me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’d bet anything Biden is the nominee and Biden wins the general. MAGA Cultists are so gullible.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well i just laid out a 40 dollar parlay.

Do you agree to the bet?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’ll take my money now. Biden just clinched the nomination! 😂

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Was this the convention? Did I miss the convention?

You still got days bro, but it looks very likely you've made at least 20 bucks so far.

Democratic convention is in August. So if Biden is still kicking you get at least 20 bucks.

Edit: You also have to agree on the bet. You never actually agreed to the bet (see comment chain).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yep, I agree for sure. Only a complete dumbass would be in denial of Biden winning the nomination. Bye the way, how’s your two time popular vote loser, sexual assaulting, financial fraud, election interfering, convicted felon doing?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Bro you are completely delusional if you think I'm for Trump.

And our bets still stands yeah?

Because I'm feeling better than ever about it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Who should Biden worry about more? Getting the left wing of his party to nominate him, or getting the general electorate to the polls in November? It's a no brainer calculation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean, the Democrats have been screwing the actually Left for decades now so...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (10 children)

If y'all actually voted, Democrats would care about you more. The Left is fickle and the DNC knows it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The issue is the left is simply not large enough to win a primary. The reason Bernie wasn't nominated is simple: not enough votes.

Our system is one of coalition building. You either join the least bad coalition for your interests or you have no influence at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The left actually demands politicians earn their vote. Politics isn't supposed to be a team sport in the US. The entire reason we have elections so often is to make sure the voters approve of their representatives. That means voting out of team loyalty is a subversion of the system. And the charge of being fickle and lazy is undemocratic propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Democracy is about compromise. By refusing to compromise you're ceding power to the worst option.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Compromise requires both sides. And supplying a genocide isn't compromise.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"Not genocide" is not an option.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It is. Biden can stop providing arms to Israel.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And how are you gonna make him do that?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

Voting uncommitted. Showing force. If Biden wants votes, he needs to not commit genocide.

I'll still vote for him most likely, even if he is a disgusting warmonger, because I know Trump is worse. However, I want him to see the magnitude of hatred the Americans he thought he could rely on for votes have for him and his genocidal antics.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's bullshit. Leftists vote, the problem is that liberals aren't leftists and only care about serving Capital.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So there's more liberals than leftists. That's democracy.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Your point is wrong, though. Leftists voting for dems will only encourage more liberal policy, not leftist policy. You're advocating for leftists voting third party and spoiling their vote.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm advocating for leftists voting for the most left Dem they can get in any given race. Not for splitting the vote.

Liberal is better than fascist, correct?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The most "left" dem is right wing and wants to implement right wing solutions. The dems are not left.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Dems are more left than the literal nazis on the right wing.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Being less right does not mean more left, because politics are not actually axial. Being less right wing does not necessarily mean you're more Socialist.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So you're just claiming that whatever you believe, at the intensity you believe, is left wing, and all other things are not.

Stupid as hell, but whatever.

The point of my comment was liberals are not as bad as actual literal nazis. Do you disagree?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No, I'm not claiming that, lol. Don't put words in my mouth, especially if you're acknowledging that it's stupid as hell. It's both not what I said, and is condescending as fuck.

Left wing refers to Socialism, ie worker ownership of the means of production. Could be via Democratic Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, Synicalism, whatever. Liberalism isn't in that picture, because it's focused on Capitalism.

Liberals aren't as bad as Nazis, which is what you should've said, instead of saying that liberals are more left wing than Nazis. That doesn't make any sense, liberals aren't any more Socialist, they just aren't as fascist, so they are less extreme Capitalists.

Simple.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Liberals aren’t as bad as Nazis

Great. I'm gonna ignore all the other red herrings and drill down on this.

When your options are "bad" and "less bad", shouldn't you vote for "less bad"?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I never insinuated otherwise. However, your point this entire time is that this should move America to the left, and that leftists should be happy with that, which is wrong in both cases.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well I disagree with your weird take that there's not a spectrum from right wing to centrist to liberal to "leftist", so the terminology is different. In your weird non axial political verbiage, I would say "this should move America farther away from the right, and that leftists should be happy with that."

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It moves America further from fascism, but not closer to Socialism. Given that the goal of leftists is both anticapitalism and pro-socialism, failing to include the pro-socialist aspect means it's never going to be good for leftists, just not as bad, thus its on the liberals to actively throw the leftists a bone, rather than being not as evil.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

it’s never going to be good for leftists, just not as bad

It's pretty much a moral requirement when given a binary choice to choose the less bad option.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

Sure, but you've been working off false reasoning, and the point is that Biden has a responsibility to appeal to leftists if he wishes to garner more of their votes. You're blaming voters for bad policy by Biden, which doesn't make sense.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

Who should Biden worry about more?

I think those 726k Trump voters are still winnable if Biden can just move a liiiiittle bit farther to the right.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I reregistered as independent after voting for Obama twice, Hillary, and then Biden.

Far left and far right are absolute lunatics, and the left will demonize you for trying to be centrist. So voting for Trump or uncommitted we go.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Trump calls someone a RINO like every 15 minutes, and he’s far right. What are you even talking about? You should probably go with uncommitted if you’re a single issue voter on whether people called you names for being a centrist.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Some replies have been nice, and then there are some like yours. Did you not read the part where the left demonizes more often for having nuanced political viewpoints?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›