this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
372 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3066 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump has a very long history of using this kind of thing to say what the campaign is thinking about doing.

If you want to stop that kind of fascist outcome, about the only real option is to make sure Biden gets reelected and has a Democratic congress to help him.

That means three things:

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 84 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That’s not a dogwhistle. That’s a dogsiren.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

The dog nazi party

[–] [email protected] 43 points 5 months ago

Reich on time.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 months ago

America: I did Nazi that coming

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago

Even if it references the unification of germany in the 19th century there's no way most of his base thinks of that Reich when seeing the word.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Let's entertain the idea that an unknown staffer accidentally missed the word... Why was the word even there in the first place?? It really shouldn't be necessary to check your drafts or templates for accidental nazi references.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

When a campaign hires staffers like Stephen Miller, and the candidate has said neo-nazis and white supremacists are fine people, that right there is likely the reason.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

"At least one of the headlines flashing in the video appears to be text that is copied verbatim from a Wikipedia entry on World War I: “German industrial strength and production had significantly increased after 1871, driven by the creation of a unified Reich.”

That's definitely a strange thing to go searching to put on your propaganda piece. IDK who actually made the video though.

Reminds me of a joke "now I'm not saying the president is a Nazi, all I'm saying is Nazis love the president."

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago

Right Wingers when Joe Biden stood behind some Red lighting: "This is the end of our republic, this man is evil."

Right Wingers when Trump is using Nazi messaging for the 100th time: "Mainstream media is always lying, Fake news fellow patriots."

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Conservative cognitive dissonance is wild.

Hates Jews. Defends Israel to the death.

You have to wonder if they even know that Israel is full of Jews...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A large portion also think that it's a requirement for the apocalypse, which, being a doomsday cult, they are actively trying to achieve.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm, unfortunately, aware. But I see the Lebensraum motivation as a bigger effect.

I recommend rejecting the line between selfish scammer, evil, and extremely ignorant. There's a Venn diagram for these people and it rolls smoothly.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The 30-second video appeared on Trump’s account at a time when the presumptive Republican nominee for president, while seeking to portray President Joe Biden as soft on antisemitism, has himself repeatedly faced criticism for using language and rhetoric associated with Nazi Germany.

It was posted and shared on the former president’s Truth Social account while he was on a lunch break from his Manhattan hush money trial.

“This was not a campaign video, it was created by a random account online and reposted by a staffer who clearly did not see the word, while the President was in court,” Karoline Leavitt, the campaign press secretary, said in a statement.

It seems these two statements are in contradiction. Also. It was totally a staffer who didn't see the bits about a reich. Yeah. it was an honest mistake, and not even more nazi rhetoric from the orange turd that has been using nazi rhetoric since his first presidential campaign...

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I would have been shocked seven years ago. Now, knowing him today I am not.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I stopped being surprised by Nazi trump around the $88 baseball and the '14 word' immigrant bill.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


NEW YORK (AP) — A video posted to Donald Trump’s account on his social media network Monday included references to a “unified Reich” among hypothetical news headlines if he wins the election in November.

It was posted and shared on the former president’s Truth Social account while he was on a lunch break from his Manhattan hush money trial.

Earlier this month, Trump said at a fundraiser that Biden is running a “Gestapo administration,” referring to the secret Nazi police force.

Trump previously used rhetoric echoing Adolf Hitler when he said immigrants entering the U.S. illegally are “poisoning the blood of our country,” and called his opponents “vermin.”

At least one of the headlines flashing in the video appears to be text that is copied verbatim from a Wikipedia entry on World War I: “German industrial strength and production had significantly increased after 1871, driven by the creation of a unified Reich.”

In one image, the headlines “Border Is Closed” and “15 Million Illegal Aliens Deported” appear above smaller text with the start and end dates of World War I.


The original article contains 377 words, the summary contains 180 words. Saved 52%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

I look forward to the enlightened and unifying rule of Fürer Trumpf and have never, not once, questioned his mental faculties, business acumen, or bladder strength.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not to downplay this and I'm still concerned but it seems like they used this template but didn't bother editing it out.

https://elements.envato.com/newspaper-vintage-history-headlines-promo-6UD9B8E

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If that's what they started with, they managed to make significant edits, notably rescaling and moving the "unified third reich" text way to the left, while choosing to leave it in the final video.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Yea its very fucking sus they decided not to remove that headline

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Is there a link to the video in question? I didn't see one in the article

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Did this include the video?