this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44152 readers
1935 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Social media

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Homeopathy?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Printer inkt. In our shop people are still buying them for a way to high price…

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Windows. You pay ~100€ just to give your personal data to MS and get a bloated OS that will use all of your resources. Even MacOS is a more fair deal than this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Landlording

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Back up off my thin mints motherfucker.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Paying for cellular data, in advance, regardless of whether or not you use it with no possibility of refunding any you didn't use.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Commoditized bottled water.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Individualism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Your ISP is suddenly asking for more money. What are you gonna do? Disconnect from the internet?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Homes as wealth-creators.

Americans take it as received wisdom that homes are meant to generate income through higher valuations over time. We just assume home prices go up over time and if it's not actively increasing in value, the home was a failure.

Many other countries don't treat homes this way. They are dwellings, invest what you want to your liking, but it's not a retirement account.

This focus on wealth generation creates lots of perverse incentives, such as exclusionary zoning, building on lots that are overly large, and suburban sprawl. These don't reflect people's actual, desired form of housing but rather maximize wealth for homeowners at the expense of everyone else.

We have a completely warped view of housing that causes us to be preyed upon by real estate agents, landlords, HOAs and the like.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Capitalism and religion, easily the top two scams.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The scam that has passed the test of time. So scamming good, that even communists turn to it!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I would argue that feudalism is a lot more time tested than this garbage system that even in theory is so flawed that it regularly results in global economic crises. Feudalism on the other hand has been considerably more stable throughout the centuries and whether or not you are forced to serve a nobleman or a CEO is not a big difference. So, stop getting scammed and get back to the fields, peasant.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You really are a power user! Lol

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh, no, surely not. Pool the risk and only pay for your share of the risk. Somebody takes some risk in that, because statistics don’t always pan out, even at large, so the risk taker gets a return. Literally couldn’t be further from a β€œscam” - it’s one of the few amazing upsides to using money instead of bartering.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

Sorry I should say "private insurance" specifically health-insurance.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί