this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
182 points (91.4% liked)

politics

18894 readers
2970 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 170 points 4 months ago (4 children)

This entire time I have never said a bad thing about Barron Trump. His future was not set for him. He could still be a decent person. But now that he is 18, and involved in the Republican party, he is fair game.

Tiny Trump is Total Trash.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I'm not gonna pretend he deserves anyone's pity or that you should change your opinion here, but acting like 18 is some magic age where someone is suddenly completely responsible and free of childish impulses/problems is ridiculous. Society may need to set an age for accountability in a legal sense, but socially, humans just don't work that way.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 4 months ago (3 children)

At 18, he’s legally free to walk away from his shit-for-brains father and make his own choices.

He chooses nepotism. He may not be totally mature, but they are his choice.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He’d be free to walk, taking a leap into the unknown at the cost of losing almost everything he has. Expecting that sort of heroic act of him is not entirely reasonable.

OTOH, judging by the photos, he does give off Brock Turner/Kyle Rittenhouse vibes. If, having grown up where he did, he turned out to be an aggressive predator, it would not be a huge surprise.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago

I’m almost certain he’d be able to land on his feet.

Almost any publisher would pay rights for “growing up trump”, for example.

I wouldn’t have expected him to totally walk away… but his choices are now his to make in a way they weren’t before.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Also, why do we act like 18 is the magic minimum age when someone should know better? I remember being 15, 16, 17 and having a solid understanding of morals and how to participate in society. I wasn't special.

It's not "You're 18 now, so you should know better." It's "For fucks sake, you're 18. You should have figured this shit out years ago."

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago (16 children)

He’s not a minor anymore and he can make decisions to be in politics or not. That’s my point. He was totally unknown until now. I was HOPING he would disown his family. But, apparently they’re all insane.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Definitely agree, but for what it’s worth, I certainly didn’t stop being a dumbass teenager the moment I turned 18.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but he made a choice there. And for that choice he deserves to be criticised.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Especially when you have constant pressure to be that way from everyone around you. Truth be told, I've always just felt bad for the kid. Sure we're to the point where you've gotta expect him to at least start thinking for himself, but that type of deprogramming takes a long ass time.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Well, feel bad until he starts slamming minorities.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 127 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Daughter In-law co-chair of the party, son is a delegate, daughter and son in-law are part of the cabinet.

The red hats are looking a LOT like the red coat monarchy that we declared independence from.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 4 months ago

Conservatives want to be ruled by a king. That's why the ruling class created political conservatism post-revolution.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

We really should have some sort of law that if you hold any high office of government, your immediate family (maybe for 2 generations) is permanently barred from serving in a similar capacity. Some sort of anti-dynasty law.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 107 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Fuck nepo babies and dynastic politicians.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 89 points 4 months ago

So if Baron Trump has entered the world of politics, that means that the rest of his life is no longer closed to scrutiny. Stupid move. You can't have it both ways.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I've always wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt, regardless of who his parents are. He's about to throw away that goodwill.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

I've only ever seen comments online saying they feel bad for him being in that environment or that they hope he turns out normal. In hindsight, it's kind of astonishing any Trump was afforded such grace from the general public.

And that little shit threw it away his very first chance to do so. Fuck him.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Nepo babies are gunna be nepo babies.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 4 months ago (11 children)

Has he registered for selective service, or does he have those pesky genetic bone spurs that allow you to play football, baseball, soccer, and wrestling while attending military school, but prevent you from actual military service?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 4 months ago

Audible "ugggggghhh".

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Same solid credentials as H. W. Bush: his father participated in an insurrection against the country.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

Republicans aren't really bother about being republican. They like the idea of monarchy. Powerful leaders that will crush their enemy's. They don't realise they will eventually become a target for the tyrant.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

Conservatives are perpetually stuck in the 1500

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago

Someone give that bitch a wedgie

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I'm not naive enough to believe that Barron is going to magically turn his back on his family or anything like that. He's a Trump and at the end of the day, he's most likely going to fall in line and become another Wal-Mart level clone of his father just like his brothers did.

But he also just turned 18, and we know exactly nothing about him, his political views, or why he became a delegate in the first place.

There could be a possibility he's doing this just for his father and has little to no real interest in politics. Does he even understand the ramifications of what he's doing? Legit question. I honestly don't know. There's also the possibility he's savvy enough to use the Trump name to jump-start his political career, then take a career path that's very different from his father's once he's established himself (I'm not even saying he'd be a Democrat, but but even a Mitt Romney-style Republican would be very different from Trump and the MAGA party). Or he could just be another Trump clone setting himself up to march to his father's MAGA drum for the next several decades.

I fully acknowledge that the chances of him being a clone of his father are probably above 99.9%. But until we start learning more of his political views or what his own objectives are, I'm willing to give him that .1% benefit of the doubt. For now.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Counter point: All political dynasties should be banned.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

So if one of Obama's daughters wanted to get into politics, they should be banned because their dad was already President?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

I kinda think so, otherwise you’re kinda setting yourself up for oligopolies

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

He's 100% voting for his father at the convention and helping his father in the campaign. That's what I'll judge him for, just like any other Trump delegate.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

He's an adult who's officially aligned himself with a national criminal and terrorist organization. What else do we need to know?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Does this mean he has to stop his illustrious career with the cyber?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I supported him more than the others in the family. Not so much now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But... why support any of them at all?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Because he was just a kid born into this shit. Now he's a participant.

Similarly, Ivanka sucks, but not nearly as much as her father.

I assume "support" is used here like "least favorite". Whatever your least favorite thing is; it's nowhere on your actual favorites list. It's just how we say "this sucks the most" while using less abrasive words.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›