this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

US Authoritarianism

714 readers
420 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: [email protected]

founded 6 months ago
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Damn those terrorists terroristically covering over the swastikas of very fine God-fearing Americans peacefully exercising their right of free speech to advocate for racial subjugation and genocide.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They left out the fascistic ones, I see.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago

no they didnt its two pages down the document i am going to cry and throw a fit

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't see any inaccuracies in this, and it isn't really necessarily showing these in a negative light. It is just a factual infograghic used to quickly identify symbols in leftist spaces.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

OP is trying to imply the the FBI thinks these symbols automatically mean terrorism, which is not what they're saying. This is just an identification guide for symbols. Both the far left and the far right have terrorists. The right has an awful lot more at this moment in time, but the FBI can investigate more than one organization simultaneously.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

https://vault.fbi.gov/domestic-terrorism-symbols-guide/domestic-terrorism-symbols-guide-part-01/view

i mean absolutely no personal disrespect to any of you, but I find myself genuinely coming away with the opinion that this might be the laziest community I have ever been responsible for helping build.

and this is an offshoot of a subreddit

__ The source. of the screenshot. was in . the post. i linked. as source. WHy does this comment have 7 upvotes and no downvOTEs? __

I am not implying dick. edit-They say it right there

==>-->

hem to paraphrase:

'this document is about terrorism' - 'specifically anarchists'

they 'hate authority' and 'do crimes'

'we dont generally care about any of this, but reserve the right to'

'and courts say thats the end of it'

I know I dont have the final say on anything. that would be weird.

but

This is just an identification guide for symbols.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, don't crop out context if you want people to understand that context? If your solution to getting people to understand your message is for them to do more of the work for you, you're never gonna get the impact you're looking for.

Furthermore, in the original/expanded image, they specifically identify the problematic group as Anarchist Violent Extremists, not just anarchists, meaning it's not the anarchy part they have a problem with. They also emphasize the point that use of these symbols is not enough to identify a person or organization as a violent extremist and that they're not even interested in people who just say stuff about anarchy.

It's the same as saying "right-wing American terrorist groups often fly the Confederate flag, but the flag alone is not enough to identify a terrorist as some people use the flag to symbolize the American South East."

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

OK. I don’t agree about what reality is with you enough to have a conversation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The other person is seems entirely correct. If you disagree with them on the epistemic level, then you need to seriously reevaluate how you interpret evidence.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Let me explain... ...I don't know how to explain that when a law enforcement agency says that it is only interested in investigating your organization for crimes. that is. not something that you should take as reassuring. It outlines a level of trust in the establishments of imperial power that ,. supporters of this line of thought here would be okay with showing cops around the clubhouse, because you're confident they won't decide that what you are doing here is a crime. It is an avenue for the state to label its own political opponents as [legal to oppress with state power]s. All of the nonsense in this thread of is providing cover for that and that's the end of it for me.

__

AND ANOTHER THING

normal average americans that fly the confederate flag are white supremists. They are supporting domestic terrorism. like that even gets at all what i mean. this whole thing exists to make the 'inherent racial hierarchy' that this country was founded on and operated under for its entire dam history up until .. .. . . . . wHen?EXACtly?? just palatable enough that I get looked at like Im the crazy one for bringing up how the pattern of suppressing communist and anarchist political factions in the united states is the f*CkInG God**MN **kING POInT of thE FBI fUK

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Guess Lemmy is on a watchlist now...

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago

a completely understandable assumption. That ones on me. the paragraph right above where this screenshot cuts off actually super pinky swears that they won't keep track of people just for using them.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I have included the link to the source document directly in the post. It was accessible through the source link at the bottom at any time. -moving past that- my favorite part of the source document is how Anarchists are the only ones to get an actual "tactics" section. Whereas, the militas get a list of crimes

pfft

lol