this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
715 points (97.7% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5712 readers
1244 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 71 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Statistically 1 in 4 billion people will die of Boing whistleblower disease.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

Well, assuming that the cases we know of are the only cases

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

That's the big picture. The small picture is at 100% of Boeing whistleblowers this year only continued living for a few months after blowing their whistles. (Disclaimer: no facts were checked in the writing of this comment.)

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

It’s crazy that we live in a time where a huge corporation can quite literally call hits on whistleblowers with impunity.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Trump will never be punished for anything, why would they? He and all those Epstein prosecutions have proven once and for all that rich and powerful is all you need to do literally anything you want.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I wish I had chosen to be a criminal in this life. I would have gotten so much further ahead.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

only if youre a criminal with an incomprehensible amount of money

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

And only rob the poor. Touch the rich and the law will dropkick you so fast.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Did you mean with impunity?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

and send a message to everyone else: try to talk about shady activity or corruption, go on, try.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Too big to fail, too big to jail

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

This should be a thing. Can we all agree to make this a thing?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I have a feeling that this data only represents the two boeing whistleblowers that died recently and not all of them, but I can't be certain as OP has not cited where they got this data

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The rest of the whistleblowers need to die before their life span can be added to the data.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

We could still use their current ages to make a lower bound

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

And here I was thinking that whistleblowing was supposed to about blowing the whistle, not about whistling and afterwards blowing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Is it significantly different?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes, early 40s is significantly different from late 70s.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I meant statistically significant. Like in "how much chance is there that this difference was due to randomness ?". There is statistcal tests for that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Afaik, there are only two dead Boeing whistle blowers, so you can't form any sort of actually meaningful statistics on their life expectancy due to the small sample size. However it's enough to say "that looks very suspicious and I think these 'suicides' should be investigated as murders", and I think the meme is just meant to draw attention to that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Yeah this wasn’t exactly a scientific endeavor on my part.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Seriously !? Why is it so weird that I make a statistical joke on a meme that makes fun of statistics XD

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Didn't see this till I posted the other reply. I'd say your first one looks enough like a joke, but the second followup makes it look like you're serious.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I mean, since the sample size is rather small, it's not really possible to do a reliable statistical analysis on Boeing whistleblowers,.

As a straight percentage, however, they DO suddenly die in their early 40s much more often than the general population, so might not be total happenstance 🤷

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

A-are you asking for accurate statistical analysis in c/funny?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Yes XD I realised my mistake now

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I'm waiting for some irish person to comment. Will this get OP killed in Norn Iron?