this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2023
419 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59091 readers
3545 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
419
Twitter violated contract by failing to pay millions in bonuses, US judge rules (www.nbcnews.com)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Twitter violated contract by failing to pay millions in bonuses, US judge rules::WASHINGTON — Twitter violated contracts by failing to pay millions of dollars in bonuses that the social media company, now called X Corp, had promised its employees, a federal judge ruled on Friday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Twitter’s lawyers argued that the company made only an oral promise that was not a contract, and that Texas law should govern the case, according to Courthouse News, which first reported the ruling.

Are you shitting me? They argued that it was a fucking lie so they shouldn't be charged? Also no one gives a shit if you're a Texan company...But you're doing business in California with California residents, you have to follow California rules. Else don't do any business in California.

Can't fucking believe that not honoring an employment contract is not a fucking violation in Texas...Go figure.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago

Did they honestly try to argue that oral contracts are not binding? I mean it's easy to pretend they didn't happen, but if you admit you said it then it's a contract.