this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
294 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59111 readers
3256 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
294
UK plan to digitise wills and destroy paper originals "insane" say experts (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

UK plan to digitise wills and destroy paper originals "insane" say experts::Department hopes to save £4.5m a year by digitising – then binning – about 100m wills that date back 150 years

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Something like this. But seriously, this is how GilBates1!!1 becomes the newest billionaire.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

For archival, I think things are less controversial. No one is going to modify a will executed 100 years ago and the world will say "goly gee, we missed that, we will now take from the proper heirs and give to you".

For one, it's a closed matter even if they legitimately failed to execute on the old will.

For another, if it somehow did matter, they'd probably validate the authenticity of the digital copy at least against some air gapped signature, if not going to restore the actual document from offline.

For the voting example, I think people think too highly of the paper system. Corrupt voting infrastructure can have stuffed ballots ready to go and enough non voting registered voters to back up their ballots beyond the reasonable extent an audit would ever go. Paper votes have often been corrupted. Most we ever do is recount, and if the ballots were stuffed, this would do nothing.