this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
351 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59217 readers
2949 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Controversial AI art piece from 2022 lacks human authorship required for registration.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Human brains don’t have perfect recollection. Every time we retell a story or remember a memory or picture an image in our head it is distorted with our own imperfections.

When I prompt an AI to create an image it samples the images it learned from with perfect recollection.

AI does not learn the same way humans do.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is incorrect actually. The models these AIs run from by definition have imperfect recall otherwise they would be ENORMOUS. No, that's actually exactly the opposite of how these work.

They train a statistically weighted model to predict outputs based on inputs. It has no actual image data stored internally, it can't.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is incorrect actually. The models these AIs run from by definition have perfect recall and that is why they require ENORMOUS resources to run and why ChatGPT became less effective when the resources it was allocated were reduced.

-ChatGPT

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, they take exponentially increasing resources as a consequence of having imperfect recall. Smaller models have "worse" recall. They've been trained with smaller datasets (or pruned more).

As you increase the size of the model (number of "neurons" that can be weighted) you increase the ability of that model to retain and use information. But that information isn't retained in the same form as it was input. A model trained on the English language (an LLM, like ChatGPT) does not know every possible word, nor does it actually know ANY words.

All ChatGPT knows is what characters are statistically likely to go after another in a long sequence. With enough neurons and layers combined with large amounts of processing power and time for training, this results in a weighted model which is many orders of magnitude smaller than the dataset it was trained on.

Since the model weighting itself is smaller than the input dataset, it is literally impossible for the model to have perfect recall of the input dataset. So by definition, these models have imperfect recall.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In other words they require exponentially more input because the AI doesn’t know what it is looking at.

It uses its perfect recollection of that input to create a ‘model’ of what a face should look like and stores that model like a collage of all the samples and then uses that to reproduce a face.

It’s perfect recollection with an extra step.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, what you described is simply not a perfect recollection. It is many small tidbits of information that combined together can make a larger output.

That's exactly how our brains work too

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If our brains worked exactly the same as AI programming then AI wouldn’t be needed because it would be no different than how we are doing things without AI.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I feel like you keep misrepresenting what I'm saying. Nowhere did I say that our brains work completely and exactly the same as AI. However, we do learn in much the same way. By amortizing small amounts of information and drawing connections between them

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that the way they constantly fuck up hands is a solid demonstration that these AI tools do not have a perfect recollection

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The reason they fuck up hands is because hands are usually moving during pictures and have many different configurations compared to any other body part.

So when these image AIs refer back to all the pictures of hands they’ve been fed and use them to create an ‘average approximation’ of what a hand looks like they include the motion blur from some of their samples, a middle finger sticking up from another sample or extra fingers from the sample pictures of people holding hands etc and mismatch them together even when it doesn’t fit in the picture being created.

The AI doesn’t know what a hand is. It is just mixing together samples from its perfect recollection.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

What? No

How many pictures do you see online where the hands are in motion, or even blurred?

Hands are usually behind objects when they hold something and can indeed have tons of variations and configurations. Even human artists fuck up all the time or just not draw them at all.

AI don't combine samples. If they did they wouldn't be able to generate new pictures of whatever subject you want in a specific style you want and then have multiple variations of that picture.

It isn't a copy and paste, it is interpreting the drawing and modifying it based upon the prompt.