this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
689 points (83.2% liked)

Technology

59322 readers
5220 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

you mean the rootkits that won't run on Linux?

[–] [email protected] 36 points 11 months ago (4 children)

When did 'rootkit' come to be a generic term for invasive software? Rootkits are a specific type of thing.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 11 months ago

Anticheats that run in the NT kernel may as well be described as rootkits, especially as they aren't transparent about exactly what they're doing. Then there's the question of what happens if they get compromised

[–] [email protected] 36 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Vanguard, BattlEye, EasyAntiCheat, Ricochet, etc... all run in the Windows Kernel and most, if not all, have the functionality to run arbitrary code, so might as well class them as rootkits.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

If it has kernel level access and can run arbitrary code, that's a rootkit.

It's absolutely valid to call these systems rootkits.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

Because “rootkit” sounds more ominous and scary than “kernel level anticheat” and the communities complaining about such things aren’t known to keep hyperbole to a minimum. Gotta push that FUD.

This article for instance, using language that insinuates a huge gap in performance between the Linux distros and windows, when it’s a 6% difference between the best and the worst, on one set of hardware.