this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
351 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

37718 readers
382 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I feel similarly but one of those choices is guaranteed not to help the people you'd like to see helped

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm not so sure that's true. What if normalizing and removing friction from piracy gets to the point where the streaming services have to react by providing better services and better payouts?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's easy to say, but what can they actually do that provides a better service than piracy at this point? They can't compete on price, number of shows, or quality of shows with piracy by a long shot. They can potentially provide a better ease of experience with quick downloads and casting, but they already have that and I don't know that it can get any better.

As a general rule, I'd assume more piracy means less money into an industry, and less money in means fewer and less risky products that appeal to the lowest common denominator.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There's lots they can do...

  • cheaper prices (by lowering the % of rent-seeking),
  • better pay distribution for creators (Especially so that I pay to support the shows I watch rather than a global pool),
  • interoperability (to allow new businesses which provide frontends to multiple streaming services),
  • social (clipping and sharing, group watching, etc)
  • more equal promotion of shows/movies (instead of based on royalty rates)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I already said, they can't compete on price. Cheaper prices will always be more than free. Same with interoperability, if you have the actual file you can run on anything. Group watching already exists.

More equal promotion of shows/movies and pay distribution don't actually help make the experience better for the consumer, that's more relying on the consumer behaving ethically and that they believe piracy is wrong. It only helps for the people who think it was only sometimes wrong, which I don't think is a huge group (although they are certainly the most vocal supporters of piracy)