this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
849 points (96.0% liked)

memes

9695 readers
3071 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I followed the ones posted. None of them say the opposite, they all leave out the results from the lidded flushes. And someone else posted a paper that showed that although lid closed produced fewer particles, they were larger, and lasted longer, so flushing lid closed was not particularly more hygienic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's not a research article, it's an opinion piece with no published data and no references.

here's a real research article that found lidded flushing still produced large aerosolized droplets on flushing:

https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.fis2019.po0192

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I'm not sure how this qualifies as being any better, I read this one previously and found it to be lacking in actual data information. It makes claims but literally anyone can write whatever they want on the Internet. It's not enough data and not clear on how they actually measured or how many measurements they took