this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
868 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59091 readers
4107 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Spotify pays 70% of its profits to artists. Not revenue. Almost all your subscription money and ad revenue goes to spotify. They just at some point decide that's enough to take to spend on spotify, then give a tiny tiny amount to artists.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago

Not strictly correct. Spotify pays out from its net revenues (revenues when billing costs and tax are removed) and it pays to the various industry rights holders who then distribute the money. There are lots of complex deals in place and big rights holders are likely to have better deals than ad hoc users, plus it's different in different countries.

The 70% figure is a PR thing Spotify pushes about as part of its constant battles with rights holders on exactly how much it will pay them. It's trying to claim most of the money goes to artists but it's opaque how much goes where.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

That's patently false, it's 70% of revenue that goes to rights holders.

Seriously, why lie like this?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

70% of Spotify profits is a 'tiny tiny amount'?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Their last quarterly financial statements shows $65 million profit on $3.36 billion in revenue. So, yes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

70% of profits would be miniscule, but the figure is not true so you can safely disregard everything they said.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Say they have 1 billion in potential profits.

Wow heey look at all those CEOs, let's use 900.000.000 to raise their salaries, or use it to buy up some competitor!

Uh oh, nothing left for the artists... except some well known ones who'll get a sweet deal.