this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
704 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

60129 readers
2696 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Regardless of your feelings on ads/tracking being invasive, the fact of the matter is that’s how the website makes money

It has nothing to do with feelings. The data they track has a value. You’re claiming they “aren’t making money off of you”. They are.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Again, you missed my point. If you’re blocking those ads and trackers, they have no data from you and therefore you have no value to them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

If you’re blocking those ads and trackers, they have no data from you

Let’s pause and pretend that’s true.

….Ahhh. 😃 if only.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you're wrong, actually. Google sells ads, not data. They USE data to target ads which is where the big bucks are. If you block ads, all the data in the world wouldn't allow them to profit. So by blocking ads you are preventing Google from collecting any revenue from your participation

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn’t say they sell data I said that the data they track has a value. Try again

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

well it doesn't have any value if it can't be sold or used

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We can agree to disagree about this. I don’t think my obligation is to maximize my ARPU for Google. And given how malignant they are it’s now my mission to maliciously minimize my value to them. Maybe we are just on different wavelengths. Enjoy your Google services.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but I think you were being intentionally misleading by disputing that Google isn't making money off of you if block ads, despite the fact that that person was correct.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I go to a store, I see a nice shirt, I don’t buy it, but I tell a friend about the shirt and he goes to buy it. Did the store make money off of me?

I watch a YouTube video and share it with a friend. That friend watches it and consumes ads (because my friend is a moron, sure). Did Google make money off of me?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But that wasn't the point your were making. You were saying that the data has value in relation to your point, not the exposure. The implication you were making was that Google could still profit off the data

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They are pursuing a multi variate strategy. They want to collect data and sell ads. They are directly related to each other.