this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
911 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59217 readers
2900 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Recognizing fake news now a required subject in California schools::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 98 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (40 children)

I like that it's a critical thinking subject, but it would be much better if you taught generic critical thinking, and used "recognising fake news" as one of the applications for critical thinking.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Every school already teaches generic critical thinking.

Lots of people don't learn it, but lots of people don't learn basic algebra either. It's still taught.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 11 months ago

"Write 3 to 5 sentences explaining Gatsby staring across the bay at the green light of the far pier."

This is a common type of prompt that most school systems use and in theory it fosters and develops critical thinking. Why would Gatsby stare at the light? What must he be thinking about? Why did the author choose a light? But (american) school systems never actually explain what critical thinking is. Only a set of minimum requirements that students struggle through.

I hated those prompts. They seemed like the teacher was just fishing for a specific answer. Sometimes the color doesn't mean anything and the author thought it just looked nice. It wasn't until I had a sociology teacher explain it with a poignant example that it really clicked.

He asked us "Is suspending a student good punishment?" He went on to elaborate that a student that skips class gets detention. Well if he skipped class why would he go to detention? So he skips that and gets suspension instead. This student didn't want to be in school so the school ultimately punishes him by not having him in school.

Reductive and simplistic, sure. But the idea that you approach a problem or thought from many different angles to see all facets of it didn't really gel with me until that moment. We need more of that. We need the "why" of critical thinking.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)