this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
1010 points (93.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21222 readers
56 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 79 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    A lot of windows UI is 30 years old

    [–] [email protected] 62 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Pretty sure Windows has more legacy components than Linux just because no nerds are updating it in their free time

    [–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

    Windows has a lot of legacy components, because there's this Fortune 500 corporation which still depends on it in 2023. Say what you want about Windows, but its backwards compatibility is unmatched. Windows also had 32-bit x86 CPU support until Windows 10, meaning that it could still run some 16-bit Windows 3.0 apps.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

    Windows is also a clusterfuck of spaghetti code that only the most masochistic person would want to tackle. There's so much legacy stuff in there it's ridiculous. For example you can't name a file com because of the DOS days when a COM file allowed you to access the Serial ports.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    It's updated by the entreprise not users

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Exactly. Profit is the only thing that matters, so things only change if they'll increase profits.

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Then why are they acting like they want to gain less profits ?

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

    More ads/data harvesting gives you more profit

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

    Enterprise keeps what works. Why make it new?

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

    New UIs drive sales up, that's why they refresh the UI every few versions.

    [–] [email protected] 34 points 11 months ago

    Always jarring when you open a folder dialog, and an unresizeable chunk of Windows 3.1 suddenly appears.

    I know it's still in the ODBC settings, probably other places too.

    [–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    No, literally. 11 still has some pre-XP dialog boxes. The framework they were written in obviously too (+at least 11 more).

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    This framework is part of Win32API. It's still maintained and is a core API set.

    [–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    And there will be a riot if they try to change it

    [–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    There already was one... Does anyone remember Windows 8?

    [–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    it wouldn't be so bad if the change wasn't objectively worse

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

    I throughly enjoyed windows 8. Having a side screen with all programs in a fully customizable area was great

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

    This bothers me a lot and also applies, to some extent, to MS office software. If you go deep enough you end up in the same old clunky UI that actually did the job.