this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
26 points (68.6% liked)

PC Gaming

11212 readers
313 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
26
AMD Says You Don't Need More VRAM (i.ytimg.com)
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They've had same sku different vram for a while. 480 4gb and 8gb.

As long as the core counts and such are the same it's fine.

If vram isn't a bottleneck performance should be equal

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

As some commentators have mentioned, that was mostly fine at the time of Ellesmere (2016ish?) where games wouldn't so frequently shoot past that limit. In today's environment, we find that a much higher proportion of games will want more than 8 GiB of VRAM, even at lower resolutions.

Notably, the most recent predecessor in this sort of segment (RX 7600 series) used the XT suffix to denote a different SKU to customers, though it's worth mentioning that the XT was introduced quite a bit later in the RDNA3 product cycle.