Open Source

37558 readers

157 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

179

Weird Crosspost, but... (www.404media.co)

submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://dubvee.org/post/3516835

Ukraine used ArduPilot to help it wipe out Russian targets. It wasn’t the first time and it won’t be the last.

Open source software used by hobbyist drones powered an attack that wiped out a third of Russia’s strategic long range bombers on Sunday afternoon, in one of the most daring and technically coordinated attacks in the war.

In broad daylight on Sunday, explosions rocked air bases in Belaya, Olenya, and Ivanovo in Russia, which are hundreds of miles from Ukraine. The Security Services of Ukraine’s (SBU) Operation Spider Web was a coordinated assault on Russian targets it claimed was more than a year in the making, which was carried out using a nearly 20-year-old piece of open source drone autopilot software called ArduPilot.

ArduPilot’s original creators were in awe of the attack. “That's ArduPilot, launched from my basement 18 years ago. Crazy,” Chris Anderson said in a comment on LinkedIn below footage of the attack.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Why are they using ardupilot for this instead of iNav? It all looked FPV operated. None of the autonomy was used.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Might just be that it's what the operators were already familiar with. I've never used either; is there some reason that Ardupilot would be bad rather than just overkill for this use?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

In general Ardupilot is more geared towards robotics and autonomy. It allows the setting of waypoints for things like spraying crops so that it follows a path autonomously instead of being controlled manually. When controlling the drone manually iNav is simpler and generally more preferred by FPV users.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

How could so many operators coordinate and then disappear? Seems that there were no Ukrainians nearby. FPV operating via Internet would be impossible due to lags and unstable signal.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Arduino sounds like it could make high latency piloting possible:

ArduPilot can handle tasks like stabilizing a drone in the air while the pilot focuses on moving to their next objective. Pilots can switch them into loitering mode, for example, if they need to step away or perform another task, and it has failsafe modes that keep a drone aloft if signal is lost.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Looking at the video footage they flew extremely slowly at the end. The planes were stationary so they positioned themselves above the planes and then slowly descended.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I've read they attach fiber cables to drones to avoid interference

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This attack hit airbases all over Russia. Smuggling operators into Siberia to fly the drones seems unreasonable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah you're definitely right