this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2025
491 points (99.4% liked)

Ukraine

10031 readers
499 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯


πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ


πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


See also:

[email protected]

!combatvideos@SJW


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Very roughly speaking, how many comparable aircraft does Russia own, just so I can understand the extent of this attack? Sounds great either way.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I was seeing from other online spaces that this would be about 30% of Russias strategic bomber fleet and it's accompanying aircraft like their AWACs that got hit.

If that's the case that's a staggeringly bad day for the Russian air force, which means it's a good fucking day.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Thank you, and wow, that's some good fucking news.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago

30% less bombers means drone and missile attacks into Ukraine can be significantly decreased that's one of the biggest developments since the start of the war.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I feel like the AWACs is a way bigger loss than all those obsolete bombers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Those bombers have been wantonly dropping cruise missiles of to hit Ukraine. Both are significant.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, because powerful countries for better or worse did not decisively intercede to destroy them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Oh cmon dude. There are actual reasons that the west escalated their aid over a time.

It's not a reason I agree with, but their logic in doing so is also entirely justifiable.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

For what I thought I knew, they only had 3 (some say they had only one but I doubt it) airworthy AWACS (the A50) so losing one makes it impossible to patrool & cover even the most important parts of russia.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Exactly. This is a massive strike that we fully won't know the repercussions of for a little bit. We'll just have to see how their optempo changes. It honestly could be even worse for them. They have 120 of those bombers, period. Meaning some of them might not even be air worthy at all and are just spare parts.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

@Bonifratz @AnalogNotDigital I was interested in this - can you share where this figure came from / how calculated?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They have roughly 120 strategic bombers in their air force. 40 of those is 33%.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

@AnalogNotDigital Ah I found BBC, Reuters and AP quoting the Ukranian SBU " SBU officially confirmed it had carried out the strikes, saying that "34% of [Russia's] strategic cruise missile carriers" were hit" - bbc.com/news/articles/c1ld7ppr… - and that " Tu-95 and Tu-22M3, as well as A-50 were destroyed" - Claims not yet independently verified. - It sounds like a massive hit but I have a feeling that we might see independent claims downgrading the figure a bit. The "strategic cruise missile carriers" is also a bit of qualifier. I would assume that there are independent estimates of what usable air power Russia has. I'm not seeing those chime in yet.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

I think the "strategic cruise missile carriers" bit is just a bad translation, it's clear in ukranian he means "we blew up aircraft capable of launching cruise missiles" and then is discussing the specific aircraft destroyed as separate figures.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

@Bonifratz @AnalogNotDigital Do you have sources for those stats?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I just watched a couple of videos on this attack and one thing that stood out is the AWACS - Russia has 5, but only one airworthy one and Ukraine hit that one.

Basically, the Russian AF is blind outside of its bases. It's going to make it much more difficult for Russia to operate outside its borders.

One report I saw says they even hit a base near the northern border with Finland. A Russian sub has possibly been promoted to artificial reef.

Combine this attack with the two bridge collapses and the attack on Vladivostok, and Russia should be worried. Ukraine and their domestic insurgency can hit pretty much anywhere.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

Thanks. Great stuff.