this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
13 points (65.9% liked)
Privacy
38139 readers
939 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Pretty flimsy argument that they’re “linked” to Chinese military for having to comply with local data regulations. By the same argument, every EU, US, and Israeli vpn is as guilty.
From the article:
The department of defense designates every rival as a terrorist or military organization. It’s not really an accusation that holds water at this point.
Are iOS app developers usually considered rivals of the Department of Defense?
Or is it only the ones that work for the PLA?
They didn't designate all Chinese iOS developers, they singled a few out. Unless you think the DoD is trolling, they must have a reason for accusing this specific app developer.
The DoD is regularly trolling, and designating rival political ideologues as terrorists to justify unwarranted legal maneuvers.
None of that addresses the company at issue.
There are several Chinese developers involved in this investigation.
If the DoD was "designating every rival as a military organization" then why are they singling out specific Chinese developers instead of designating them all as a "Chinese Military Company"? It isn't because they "have to comply with local data regulations", all companies have to do that. All Chinese companies have to do that and not all Chinese companies are designated by the DoD as a Military Company.
So, why is this one specific company singled out? Probably because it works for the PLA, as the DoD says.
Your argument is basically "The DoD is lying" which isn't supported by any evidence in this case. "Trust me bro" from a random social media user isn't exactly a credible source.
Probably because these companies have some US competitors that want to see them taken out. This is a common tactic.
The DoD is always lying. If you still believe them at this point, you just want to be fooled. Probably appeals to your Sinophobia in this instance.