this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
116 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9587 readers
2011 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Carney brought a net zero focus with him to Brookfield. They didn't impose it on him.

And, anyway, what's wrong with wanting to reduce the damage humanity is doing to the planet that we all live on?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Some people with more money than they could ever spend might make less money than they otherwise would have in the medium term. In the long term, of course, it means nothing because climate collapse effectively makes wealth moot. But in the meanwhile, papa needs another three billion, so don't make us late for the plastic age collapse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

In the long term, of course, it means nothing because climate collapse effectively makes wealth moot

That is another repeated theme in Carney's book

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean, it's elementary math tbh. When civilizations collapse and the angry, hungry hordes go burning the countryside, the rich are especially unsafe. Our own wealthy know this, which is why they're building bunkers in NZ. This confounds me, frankly. They know that the world they're creating is going to blow up and try to kill them, so maybe, idk, stop creating that particular world instead of actively choosing to live out the rest of your days in a well-adorned hole as your wealth converges towards zero because you managed to blow up every functioning society that recognizes property rights and currency? Is next quarter's line going up a bit faster really more important than not putting yourself in a situation where you have to convince your security team to wear explosive collars?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

Is next quarter's line going up a bit faster really more important than not putting yourself in a situation where you have to convince your security team to wear explosive collars?

He also talks about changing how executive incentives work to encourage a longer term outlook and to account for the externalities that their companies/decisions create. Making sure those corporate decision makers have much more personal "skin in the game".