this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
97 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6460 readers
434 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
97
Climate Change, Once a Big Issue, Fades From Canada’s Election (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

But ... there's one side in the conversation that is refuting basic facts. This unshared reality is making it impossible to depoliticize the debate. The country can either take a hiatus from democracy entirely, or finds a way to force right-wing politicians to deal with reality again.

And it's not all about academic debates either, as someone needs to define desired outcomes, e.g., who to prioritize, today's seniors, tomorrow's refugees, today's rich people, etc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago

Of course politics is about prioritization. But some things are not politicized as we all seemingly agree it should be prioritized, like military in America.

Climate is so highly politicized because one side is refuting basic facts. They are shouting loud about it and running their propaganda, making the issue politicized. This does not seem to have happened that much in this campaign, as they are focused on other things.

For better or for worse, depending on who wins. I'm just arguing that politicization of climate is not inherently a good thing; rather, in an ideal political situation, it shouldn't be politicized at all at this point.