this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
23 points (84.8% liked)

Casual Conversation

3186 readers
396 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We've all met one, whose the worst you've met?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Giordan Benavides.

Fuck you, you lying, scheming, friendless piece of shit

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck Giordan, all my homies hate Giordan 😤

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

A story that tells you everything you need to know about Giordan:

Giordan sometimes attended a low-stakes house poker game with a group of longtimer expats in Korea. He always lost. So, one week he brought a friend and they got caught passing cards to each other. If it was any other country they'd have beat his ass

Giordan is such a self-aggrandizing narcissist that he couldn't cope with losing.

He's been booted from two Seoul Toastmasters chapters (maybe more?). Imagine what an insufferable narcissist it takes to annoy Toastmasters, a group designed to create and elevate insufferable narcissists.

I worked with Giordan and he was nuts. When I started, there were two employees and he called himself "the head teacher". Students regularly complained that Giordan would reach over and pinch their arms real hard as punishment. Giordan would lie to the boss about coworkers and lie to coworkers about the boss. He wanted to have control over everyone. He got people fired if he didn't like them.

Later I learned that everyone in Itaewon knows Giordan is a snake. I heard he can't work in Seoul anymore but I don't know why

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, I had someone try to be a Giordan in one school here in China. He was the incumbent foreign teacher and when three new foreign teachers were hired he tried to ingratiate himself with us (badly: more on that later) on the one side, offering to act as the conduit between management and the foreign teachers.

Unfortunately for Leslie (for that was his name), I had enough experience in tech firms and the social service to recognize his type. So while to his face I agreed, I opened my own conduit to the foreign affairs office as well. (Being able to speak the language somewhat helped.) And sure enough, the FA would say something reasonable and our wannabe "conduit" would transmit it with a twist that made it sound horrible and unjust and abusive and such, then he would reassure us that he would "straighten things out". To the FA he would say the foreigners are very angry and very unreasonable, but he calmed us down and blah blah blah.

Only of course it didn't work because the FA dean was talking to me, so I played back what he'd told us about the FA's statement. So he wasn't the conduit very quickly, and wasn't really welcome in the FA's office either.

The guy was a real piece of work. He claimed to be Australian. He had an American passport. He spoke with an American accent. He expressed American ideals. But he was Australian. And he kept that up until a couple of Aussies joined the crowd and one of them, after hearing enough of his "Australian" bullshit, tore a major strip out of him in front of all the other expats. After that he kept to himself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Oh wow that sounds EXACTLY like Giordan. Fucking unhinged behavior.

Giordan is even cagey about his nationality! Is he Canadian? Is he American? Who knows?