this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
244 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9574 readers
1789 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only way it could not be a terrorist attack is if it was an accident, right?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Was there a political purpose? Sounds more like a mental health problem.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All terrorists, by definition, have mental health problems

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why would you put "by definition" in there, that changes it from a "this is my opinion" to "It are a fact, i know because of my learnings".

It's possible there is a definition somewhere that specifically references mental health i suppose , i'd be interested to see it if you have a link ?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If you think that some group of people is superior to another group of people, and its justifiable to use violence against everyone in the inferior group, you have a mental illness.

Because that is what is a mental illness.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Again, not what the definition of "mental illness" generally means.

Look up an actual definition or this

Can "terrorists" have mental illnesses?, sure.

Are all "terrorists" by definition mentally ill, doubtful.

Without even getting into the subjectiveness of the term "terrorist", lets take your example.

There are plenty of situations where you can end up with that point of view and not have a legitimate "mental illness", because that term means something relatively specific and isn't a good enough fit with which to broadly paint all members of a group.

Another example of why it doesn't fit is that there are plenty of people who are evil/bad/morally bankrupt (for whatever frame of reference you are using to determine such things) that shouldn't get to use mental illness as an excuse for doing shitty things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Mental illness is never an excuse for doing shitty things.

It does require us to give them treatment to avoid harming others.

It is dangerous to not broadly paint society as mentally I'll. Look south of you. At least 30% of the US population is mentally ill, and they should all be given free treatment for this illness.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago

Mental illness is never an excuse for doing shitty things.

It can be, someone having a psychotic episode ( that couldn't reasonably be prevented or mitigated ) that hurts the people around them has a legitimate excuse for the outcome.

Part of the actual definition of mental illness could broadly be interpreted as impairment or outright loss of reasoning and cognition.

It does require us to give them treatment to avoid harming others.

Agreed.

Though i'd say, provide the framework and access to treatment, but i think we mean the same thing.

It is dangerous to not broadly paint society as mentally I’ll.

That's a very subjective take, with very vague language and almost no value as a talking point without more specificity.

To be clear, i'm not expecting an essay or anything, i just can't really respond without more information about what you mean.

Look south of you. At least 30% of the US population is mentally ill, and they should all be given free treatment for this illness.

An interesting perspective, if somewhat US centric, i mostly agree.

None of which addresses my original criticism that the definition of mental illness isn't something that should be ascribed to " all 'terrorists' ", it means something relatively specific and terrorism isn't a good synonym.