this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
12 points (100.0% liked)

Casual Conversation

3170 readers
725 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Just FYI, that [email protected] community that started out as [email protected] has now moved to [email protected].

And this week I finally started WandaVision. Actually originally wanted to watch Agatha All Along but heard it was a sequel of sorts to WandaVision, so I've been stalling since. Haven't religiously followed the MCU but I've marathon 'watched' it while playing a game or whatever. Watched some movies at the big screen. So I know what happened with Vision and all that shit and could jump right in.

About halfway through and really enjoying it so far. Then after this I believe I should (re)watch Dr. Strange in the Multiverse of Madness before Agatha All Along.

Other than that, I really need to pick up the ball with pro wrestling again.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I watched WandaVision as it came out and I really enjoyed it. The ending was a bit weak but really the end was just standard ok Marvel movie stuff which was a bit of a letdown from the white hot first episodes. Don’t let that stop you from continuing into Agatha which was incredibly good. Much better than WandaVision in my opinion. Also you don’t really need to watch MoM just look up Wanda’s part of the story and you’ll be fine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

Nice, now I'm really looking forward to Agatha All Along. And honestly I don't mind the interlude of watching MoM in between the two series m