Asklemmy

47694 readers

1367 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

-10

Should Lemmy stop accepting crypto"currencies" as donations? (beehaw.org)

submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Pump-and-dump schemes, fraud, ransomware, multi-level marketing, spam, incentivizing selfishness, greed, and general unethical behaviour, buying elections, quasi Nazis creating their own coins, et cetera. In my opinion, over the years the evidence has piled up tall enough to show that crypto"currencies" are an overal detriment to society.

It therefore surprised me to discover that behind the ♡ donation button on top of most Lemmy instances except for Beehaw, there is an option to donate "crypto". This sets a bad example. Thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago

"Russia, which is blocked from other international payment systems."

Fair enough.

"We’re still throwing around fallacies like it’s 2010? Okay, I cast fallacy fallacy!"

Guess I'll simply parry with fallacy fallacy fallacy—quoting from your linked Wiki: "That one can invoke the argument from fallacy against a position does not prove one's own position either, as this would also be an argument from fallacy".

Your latter argument for the crypto cult is that the others are problematic too, therefore it's okay to join the cult. This invalid reasoning renders the entire conclusion void. I did not claim your conclusion is false, only that your reasoning is invalid.

"like it's 2010?"

There's no expiration date on logical reasoning.