this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
808 points (97.6% liked)

Greentext

6155 readers
1596 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Windows peaked at XP. Vista was the plateau on the other side, followed by the sheer cliff of windows 7.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

What? Windows 7 was probably the best version of windows ever just ahead of 2000.

Windows 8 was where the cliff was.

People look back at XP through rose tinted glasses. It was incredibly insecure in every way. Vista made the security architecture changes needed. Windows 7 was polish on top.

Windows 8 was where metro, start menu ads, auto installing unwanted apps, and ruining Windows control panel / settings happened.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

XP was just 2000 with a teletubby desktop. I absolutely hated it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you take that back!

Bliss is beautiful >:c

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They’re right though, XP’s Luna was garbage.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

I liked it. But I also used the "classic" interface anyway, so....

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Whatever Windows you matured with is the best Windows. Mine was Windows 2000. Thanks, Dad 😂

Except ME. We don't talk about that one...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

DOS isn't Windows. Consumer versions of Windows happened to run on top of DOS until XP was released in 2001.

Maybe I should rephrase: the OS you matured with is the best OS.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Half the programs I needed to use in Windows 3.1, and 3.11 required a DOS prompt to run. It wasn't until NT that almost all software caught up enough to not need that DOS prompt so much. Although AutoCAD R9 ran like crap in NT on the 386 with math co-processor. So I needed to reboot into DOS every time I needed CAD.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Prolly, I don't really remember tbh.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

That makes sense. Lol.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

10 introduced a bunch of cool stuff that made it seem like it was going places: WSL, the new terminal, multiple desktops. If you're able to ignore the sad state of the control panel and settings apps, 10 was peak windows experience (feature-wise).

Then 11 came around and fucked everything up. As someone who subscribed to MS Insider to run beta builds of windows and get updates earlier, win 11 was the first iteration that really felt like there was just no upside to it. It was exactly the same as win10, but with some features removed and a much heavier hardware requirement. Even Vista (microsoft's most successful OS) had some cool stuff going for it back in the day, but win11 was nothing but one disappointment after another. Shit it wouldn't even let you keep a clock on the second screen until like a year after release.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Windows 7 was pretty damn good.