this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
1121 points (94.4% liked)
People Twitter
6824 readers
1409 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
While I totally agree that it shouldn't be stigmatized, "psyop by the central banks" is absolute fucking lunacy and there isn't a single shred of evidence to support it.
But muh violent revolution against the capitalists!!!
But it is. Just like the diamond industry pushed the whole wedding ring bullshit. Just follow the money. It's all the corporations wanting to bleed you dry.
For some it's getting you to live alone, for others it's to send you into the military to fight for their interest.
It's all the same bullshit. It's never a straight line to THIS guy did it, it's just the neutral emerging result of capitalism gone amok.
Well, to be fair, what would such evidence look like? Would you like to see secret documents (conveniently found in a rich banker's living room) that detail that single-family homes get easier credit benefits so that more people buy them? I'm afraid that kind of proof will be difficult to get hold of, if the banks or whoever might be behind it don't show it to us out of their own free will.
Who would look for such evidence? Who can pay for a search after that evidence? The banks won't investigate themselves and find that they manipulate people.
As such, it is directly natural that there is no proof. That doesn't automatically make it wrong though, just without proof. The question is: is it likely? is it perceivable? is it consistent?