this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
29 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

4090 readers
2 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

With the number of people who actively vote against their own interests because they’re dumb, I’m starting to agree with those who say voting shouldn’t be compulsory.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

compulsory voting removes some of the apathy: “they’re both the same” isn’t as powerful to stop people (and let’s be honest here, this tactic works best against progressives) getting out to vote if they’re already at the polling place… it virtually eliminates voter suppression

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I’m sorry but “voter suppression” isn’t a thing, especially when something as logical and simple as “have ID to prove you have the right to vote” is constantly called “voter suppression”.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

@Whirlybird @null_dot arguably, not voting is a vote against your own interests

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

It’s less of a vote against your own interests than literally voting against your own interests. Less votes means each vote has more power.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why would they suddenly not vote if it became optional? The problem isn't that they're voting, it's that they don't have the class consciousness to recognise and investigate their core interests in federal politics.

From Condorcet's jury theorem, it's clear that having a few million less voters won't solve the problem, but improving the political literacy of voters can.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lots and LOTS of people only vote because they have to, and they vote for whoever lies the best.

If they didn’t have to vote they wouldn’t, and the major parties would lose a LOT of votes, which is what needs to happen. We need independents to actually have a chance.