this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
723 points (99.1% liked)

politics

23278 readers
14 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday that President Donald Trump is exploring legal pathways to “deport” U.S. citizens to El Salvador, where the administration has already arranged to house deported immigrants in a prison known for its human rights abuses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

everyone acting like he wants to deport everyone who disagrees with him, as if that's what was said even though it wasn't

Honestly, according the video in the article, all she said Trump has talked about was the possibility of deporting repeat violent criminals. What I don't get, is why do you have to deport them? Can't you just keep them in prison?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Because once outside the US, the Republican position is that they no longer have recourse to the courts. So you can hustle somebody to El Salvador really fast, and then there is nothing they can do about it.

Whereas if you put people through the usual trial process and keep them in a US prison, they can later be freed as innocent.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So basically, point at person you don't like (like minorities) and say "You did a crime! To El Salvador with you!" and they're gone forever regardless of innocence. Great times.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

everyone acting like he wants to deport everyone who disagrees with him, as if that’s what was said even though it wasn’t

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The removal of due process will result in this happening, whether by Trump or another president down the line. It is a wildly dangerous precident to set and significantly erodes the rights of everyone in this country.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Like I said, I think they should just be kept in prison here, and not let out early if they are that bad. And if they are being let out, go after that issue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I think you may be missing the point

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Ah, that makes sense.

But, it sounds like he's only talking about the worst of the worst. So then I assume it wouldn't be hard to keep them in prison. Whatever, if those types are going free (which I have heard of happening), then there are other issues that should be dealt with.

removed extra word

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Actually no. The worst of the worst stay in the US. The people they are deporting to El Salvador are mostly non-criminals or petty criminals. The actual violent criminals (the ones that are harder to control) do not make for good slaves and are kept in whatever prison they are already in.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

No, the video in the article is talking about something that has not yet happened.