this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
1347 points (97.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

7391 readers
14 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Housing should not be an investment. They didn't lose anything except speculated value which comes at the cost of locking others out from the ability to own their own home. In fact, those morons who care so much about "muh investment" are also costing themselves through higher property taxes and ridiculous house prices they'd have to face if they ever have to move.

There are quite a few people who say they wouldn't be able to afford the house they have now if they had to finance it at today's prices and interest rates. How can they realize the capital gains on such an "investment" if they don't own more than one home? They still have to live somewhere.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

When housing is not an investment, you have far less incentive to improve or maintain the land you are on because you don’t own it and whatever you do may be met with hostility.

I think the problem isn’t with home ownership, it’s with unaffordability perpetuated by private equity and how our culture doesn’t see property ownership as a human right but instead as a privilege.

If we made residential property ownership illegal for businesses and limited individual property ownership to say, 5 properties, we’d all be better off. Rich people should be free to own places but they shouldn’t be able to profit off of it so much they choke out the middle class and play fucking monopoly with everyone’s lives.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Removing speculation from the housing market doesn't remove ownership.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

God yes. I feel like I scratched the surface here because private equity is the problem but it gets so much weirder and worse with speculative markets.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

limited individual property ownership to say, 5 properties

fine, but taxes kick in on the second and get exponentially larger with each one

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

With that I’m fine with unlimited at like, 76% tax rate.