this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
778 points (93.7% liked)

memes

14001 readers
1996 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
778
I may need to upsize from my TKL (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
301 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] -4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My biggest problem with that "monstrosity" is that it's ortholinear.

You imply that such a thing being "optimal" is absurd, but if you had infinite usable desk space then what, exactly, would be the argument against it? If space is not a consideration then what does it matter if you don't use every key?

Lots of people like smaller keyboards, and that's perfectly fine. I get it as an aesthetic choice, and for many people it may not impact their daily use at all. But you will not convince me that removing the option of having additional keys for binding is a non-zero cost, even if they're not currently being used.

For what it's worth, I never used anything like that monstrosity, but I was quite happy with my G15 for the time that I had it which had 18 additional keys, plus media control, over a typical full size.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

but if you had infinite usable desk space then what, exactly, would be the argument against it?

So I guess we agree then. Circumstances make something more or less optimal, meaning they are not objectively more optimal in every situation. That was my entire point, nothing more.