this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
822 points (99.3% liked)

People Twitter

6443 readers
1817 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
822
An ethics professor at Cambridge talks about teaching ethics in 2025 (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
153 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I don't see the problem. One can have unshakeable moral values they believe everyone should have while acknowledging those values may be a product of their upbringing and others' lack of them the same.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

What about the last part: "viewing disagreement as moral monstrosity?"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I believe abortion is moral. I believe people who disagree are morally monstrous. I can also understand that their beliefs on whether abortion is moral or not can be a product of their culture and upbringing. What am I missing? Why is this odd?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It's the kind of thing professors say when they want to go viral on some fascist platform.