this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
273 points (98.9% liked)

politics

21775 readers
3716 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

And people have the gall to shame people who stayed home and refused to vote for Kamala.

(Note, I voted for Kamala. You have to point that out or liberals shit themselves.)

We need to let the Democratic Party die completely. They are captured opposition.

Liberals pretend that it was democracy vs. fascism on the ballot in 2024. It wasn't. Democracy wasn't on the ballot. What was on the ballot were two choices:

  1. Fascism in 2024.
  2. Fascism in 2028.

Those were the only two choices. Just like Democrats now, Kamala and friends would not have made any meaningful change. They would have just coasted, sitting on their asses, doing nothing until Trump or someone worse rode into office in 2028.

Democrats didn't even bother preparing for Project 2025, even though they had the whole thing detailed in advance.

If Democrats aren't going to use what power they have while out of office, they don't deserve to be put into office.

We need a new party, a popular front that will start by crushing the Democrats and then move on to crush MAGA. We cannot kill MAGA until we first kill the corporate Democrats. They're a captured opposition that sucks all the oxygen out of the room and prevents any real good from happening. In many ways, they are worse than Republicans. At least Republicans are honest about their evil.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 21 hours ago

We need a new party, a popular front that will start by crushing the Democrats and then move on to crush MAGA.

So make it then.

Other more progressive better parties already exist. They don't get votes. What is your party going to do differently to get votes?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

But why make a new party when you can vote out establishment corporate Democrats in primaries, remaking the Democratic party? Seems pointless to start from square 1 when the Dems are right there ripe for a take over.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

when you can vote out establishment corporate Democrats in primaries

the party fights against progressives in the primaries harder than it does against republicans in the general.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

And? Progressives still win primaries all the time. If we had more people vote in them, and had more progressive candidates running, then more progressives would win regardless of what the Party wants. Republicans didn't want Trump in 2016, they desperately tried to not have him, but the voters kept voting for him so he won the primary and became the party.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Are they required by law to hold primaries?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

No but it's incredibly incredibly rare for them to not hold primaries. It only happens when there is, either an obviously massive lead, an incumbent president, or when someone is running unopposed. Both parties do that. Primaries happen 99% of the time. People say primaries didnt happen in 2024 but they absolutely did in almost all 50 states president wise and in all 50 states lower than president wise.

So while there is no law that says "you have to hold a primary" they will still be holding primaries. There's only been one time when in modern history when the incumbent isnt running and there weren't primaries held to find his replacement and that was last year with Harris.

Primaries have the problem where so few people come out to vote in them, at least on the Democrat side, that even if the people broadly seem to support a candidate in the area, they'll often not even bother voting in the primary. This happened in 2016 when Bernie lost the primary by 3 and a half million votes and only would have won if all but 9 super delegates went to him which never would have happened because he didn't win a majority of the votes.

Primaries will happen, we can vote them out. AOC did it in 2018 and we can do it nationwide next year.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

Honestly i think it would be easier and faster to take over the republican party sometimes

[–] [email protected] 6 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Thanks for voting for Kamala.

If we get to vote for President in 2028, do you think your new party will have killed the Democrats yet? If not, will you vote for the Democratic candidate again? If not, do you think there will be another chance in 2032?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 21 hours ago

I've voted Democrat my whole life out of the lesser evil thing. I think I'm going to vote third party at this point because things are getting eviler and they are part of the problem.

My question is if I vote Democrat again, will they simply maintain the status quo and do nothing until the next fascist runs on blowing up the system that they are defending that isn't working for anyone and wins again?

Because so far that's all that has happened. Oh yeah there was also that guy that won on "hope" and "change" and gave a handout to insurance companies instead of a public option.

After citizens united and before they are all owned by the same elites that crush everyone else. One party just does it under a cross and the other does it under a rainbow flag.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I don't know. I do know at this point that you might as well just write "Jesus" on the ballot instead of voting for Dems. In theory, voting for Jesus at least comes with a tiny minuscule chance of divine intervention, while voting for Dems just guarantees craven horseshit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

It would take at least three election cycles before a 3rd party to rise enough to genuinely challenge one of the parties, and in the meantime the Republicans would be fucking up the country, probably irreparably.

And that's only if they allow elections at all, or at least fair, unrigged ones.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

Check out the Working Families Party.