Technology

66353 readers

4345 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

190

OpenAI releases a 15-page set of policy suggestions for the White House, Urging for reduced regulation; Calls for a strategy to preserve American AI models ability to learn from copyrighted material. (openai.com)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just for humor's sake I plugged in the proposal itself into chatgpt to have it give a summary on how it helps or hurts the average american -- https://chatgpt.com/share/67d32e59-830c-800c-b9d6-c4abe50b37d4

The way I read that even chat gpt says it needs better safeguards

Overall Verdict

This proposal prioritizes AI industry growth and national security over strong worker and IP protections.
If implemented well, it could boost the economy, create jobs, and enhance innovation, but it needs stronger safeguards for workers and content creators to prevent exploitation.
The copyright section is the most concerning—it seems to favor big AI firms over independent creators.
The export control strategy could be effective in protecting national security but might hinder global AI collaboration.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That’s still more positive than summaries from Cohere, Qwen, Deepseek, FuseAI and Arcee 32B (the latter two being combinations of different models, it’s complicated) in my quick test.

…And I’d recommend them all, TBH. Use anything but ChatGPT for the same reasons you’d use Lemmy over Reddit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

well yeah I generally don't use AI for much anything, but in this case used it specifically because it's the opinion on something written by OpenAI, which makes it's disapproval coming from openai's algorythm more amusing.

Plus funnier for them to have to debunk... is it better for them to argue "well our AI sucks, don't take it's word for anything", or admit the obvious "you asked it for a view to the average person and not our profit margains, of course from that perspective our plan is bad".