Technology

38170 readers

349 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Christie's First-Ever AI Art Auction Earns $728,000, Plus Controversy (www.cnet.com)

submitted 16 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

More than 5,600 artists signed an open letter protesting the auction, saying that the works used AI models that are trained on copyrighted work.

A representative for Christie's shared a statement about the issue. "From the beginning, two things have been true about the art world: one, artists are inspired by what came before them, and two, art can spark debate, discussion, and controversy," the statement reads. "The discussions around digital art, including art created using AI technology, are not new and in many ways should be expected. Many artists -- Pop artists, for example -- have been the subject of similar discussions. Having said that, Christie's, a global company with world-class experts, is uniquely positioned to explore the relatively new and ever-changing space of digital art: the artists, collectors, market and challenges."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm actually against AI art since creative professions are already lacking in labor rights, and it's going to get worse now that they're trying to make artists replaceable.

But one of the worst things about it, to me, is that it's caused artists to start going to bat for IP laws. IP law is the reason you don't get to finish that story you spent years on, because HBO deleted it in a tax write-off. You don't even get to talk about what it might have been like, because you're under NDA.

Now people want it to be illegal to be influenced by copyrighted things. Great.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I'm not anti-ai art, but I think that if IP laws exists, artist should be able to use them. Either AI art is considered public domain, or it should be certified as having been trained only on public/properly compensated work. I do think current IP laws are so out of date they're basically irrelevant, but artists should be able to enforce these archaic laws if they are subject to them.

Mind you, people will probably still pay 700k for the "original print" or whatever certified/signed by the person who generated it, but at least the work itself should be public.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 54 minutes ago

AI art is not protected by copyright, yes. That isn't a "should" but rather how it actually works in nearly all countries but a few, certainly including the US.