this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
189 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

64937 readers
4373 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
189
The new 3B "fully open source" model from AMD (rocm.blogs.amd.com)
submitted 16 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This is again a big win on the red team at least for me. They developed a "fully open" 3B parameters model family trained from scratch on AMD Instinct™ MI300X GPUs.

AMD is excited to announce Instella, a family of fully open state-of-the-art 3-billion-parameter language models (LMs) [...]. Instella models outperform existing fully open models of similar sizes and achieve competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art open-weight models such as Llama-3.2-3B, Gemma-2-2B, and Qwen-2.5-3B [...].

As shown in this image (https://rocm.blogs.amd.com/_images/scaling_perf_instruct.png) this model outperforms current other "fully open" models, coming next to open weight only models.

A step further, thank you AMD.

PS : not doing AMD propaganda but thanks them to help and contribute to the Open Source World.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Nice and open source . Similar performance to Qwen 2.5.
(also ... https://www.tomsguide.com/ai/i-tested-deepseek-vs-qwen-2-5-with-7-prompts-heres-the-winner ← tested DeepSeek vs Qwen 2.5 ... )
→ Qwen 2.5 is better than DeepSeek.
So, looks good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

Dont know if this test in a good representation of the two AI, but in this case it seems pretty promising, the only thing missing is a high parameters model